These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

360 related items for PubMed ID: 30607989

  • 1. Does the Use of Locking Screws Decrease the Rate of Hardware Removal in Ankle Fractures?
    Walley KC, Gonzalez TA, Nandyala SV, Macauley A, Elnabawi Y, Rodriguez EK, Appleton PT.
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2019 Dec; 12(6):518-521. PubMed ID: 30607989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plates for Distal Fibula Fractures.
    Lyle SA, Malik C, Oddy MJ.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Dec; 57(4):664-667. PubMed ID: 29681437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Implant Failure Rates and Cost Analysis of Contoured Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation of Distal Fibula Fractures.
    Moss LK, Kim-Orden MH, Ravinsky R, Hoshino CM, Zinar DM, Gold SM.
    Orthopedics; 2017 Nov 01; 40(6):e1024-e1029. PubMed ID: 29058759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fibular Plate Fixation and Correlated Short-term Complications.
    Bäcker HC, Greisberg JK, Vosseller JT.
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Oct 01; 13(5):378-382. PubMed ID: 31538819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Fate of the Fixed Syndesmosis Over Time.
    Gennis E, Koenig S, Rodericks D, Otlans P, Tornetta P.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Oct 01; 36(10):1202-8. PubMed ID: 26041545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. True antiglide fixation of Danis-Weber B fibula fractures has lower rates of removal of hardware.
    DeKeyser GJ, Campbell ML, Kellam PJ, Haller JM, Rothberg DL, Higgins TF, Marchand LS.
    Injury; 2022 Mar 01; 53(3):1289-1293. PubMed ID: 34627627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Tubular vs Profile Plate in Peroneal or Bimalleolar Fractures: is There a Real Difference in Skin Complication? A Retrospective Study in Three Level I Trauma Center.
    Petruccelli R, Bisaccia M, Rinonapoli G, Rollo G, Meccariello L, Falzarano G, Ceccarini P, Bisaccia O, Giaracuni M, Caraffa A.
    Med Arch; 2017 Aug 01; 71(4):265-269. PubMed ID: 28974847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Versus Conventional Plate Fixation for Distal Fibula Fractures in Trimalleolar Ankle Injuries.
    Nguyentat A, Camisa W, Patel S, Lagaay P.
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Aug 01; 55(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 26497086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Locking versus non-locking one-third tubular plates for treating osteoporotic distal fibula fractures: a comparative study.
    Herrera-Pérez M, Gutiérrez-Morales MJ, Guerra-Ferraz A, Pais-Brito JL, Boluda-Mengod J, Garcés GL.
    Injury; 2017 Nov 01; 48 Suppl 6():S60-S65. PubMed ID: 29162244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Lateral Locking Plate Fixation of Simple Weber B Fibula Fractures Without a Lag Screw Yields Excellent Radiographic Results.
    Mehraban N, Lew AR, Foran IM, Lee S, Bohl DD, Hamid KS.
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2024 Apr 01; 17(2):131-136. PubMed ID: 34747245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Retrospective analysis of locked versus non-locked plating of distal fibula fractures.
    Sop A, Kali M, Spindel JF, Brown SM, Samanta D.
    Injury; 2023 Feb 01; 54(2):768-771. PubMed ID: 36539311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Variation in Implant Selection for Ankle Fractures: Identifying Cost Drivers.
    Okelana AB, McMillan LJ, Kibble K, Parikh HR, Gorman C, Schaefbauer H, Cunningham BP.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2019 Nov 01; 33 Suppl 7():S26-S31. PubMed ID: 31596781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Treating AO/OTA 44B lateral malleolar fracture in patients over 50 years of age: periarticular locking plate versus non-locking plate.
    Shih CA, Jou IM, Lee PY, Lu CL, Su WR, Yeh ML, Wu PT.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Mar 20; 15(1):112. PubMed ID: 32197662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures.
    May H, Alper Kati Y, Gumussuyu G, Yunus Emre T, Unal M, Kose O.
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 May 25; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 32451727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A biomechanical comparison study of a modern fibular nail and distal fibular locking plate in AO/OTA 44C2 ankle fractures.
    Switaj PJ, Fuchs D, Alshouli M, Patwardhan AG, Voronov LI, Muriuki M, Havey RM, Kadakia AR.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2016 Sep 15; 11(1):100. PubMed ID: 27628500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Influence of hooks and a lag screw on internal fixation plates for lateral malleolar fracture: a biomechanical and ergonomic study.
    Sakai R, Uchino M, Yoneo T, Ohtaki Y, Minehara H, Matsuura T, Gomi T, Ujihira M.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2017 Feb 23; 12(1):34. PubMed ID: 28228100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.