These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

333 related items for PubMed ID: 30668710

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Measuring welfare in rearing piglets: test-retest reliability of selected animal-based indicators.
    Witt J, Krieter J, Wilder T, Czycholl I.
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan 03; 101():. PubMed ID: 37209717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Feasibility and reliability of a German guideline for farm's self-monitoring in sows and piglets.
    Friedrich L, Krieter J, Kemper N, Czycholl I.
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Oct 01; 98(10):. PubMed ID: 32926161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Test-Retest Reliability of the 'Welfare Quality® Animal Welfare Assessment Protocol for Sows and Piglets'. Part 1. Assessment of the Welfare Principle of 'Appropriate Behavior'.
    Friedrich L, Krieter J, Kemper N, Czycholl I.
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Jun 29; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 31261972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Short communication: Evaluation of the sample size of individual indicators in gestating sows concerning the Welfare Quality® protocol applied to sows and piglets.
    Friedrich L, Krieter J, Kemper N, Czycholl I.
    Animal; 2020 Jun 29; 14(6):1278-1282. PubMed ID: 31937377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reliability of the qualitative behavior assessment as included in the Welfare Quality Assessment protocol for growing pigs.
    Czycholl I, Beilage EG, Henning C, Krieter J.
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug 29; 95(8):3445-3454. PubMed ID: 28805930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators for the on-farm self-assessment of fattening pigs.
    Pfeifer M, Eggemann L, Kransmann J, Schmitt AO, Hessel EF.
    Animal; 2019 Aug 29; 13(8):1712-1720. PubMed ID: 30630538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm welfare assessment for dairy goats.
    Battini M, Vieira A, Barbieri S, Ajuda I, Stilwell G, Mattiello S.
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Nov 29; 97(11):6625-48. PubMed ID: 25242423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Tear staining in pigs: a potential tool for welfare assessment on commercial farms.
    Telkänranta H, Marchant JN, Valros A.
    Animal; 2016 Feb 29; 10(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 26303891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effects of group housing on reproductive performance, lameness, injuries and saliva cortisol in gestating sows.
    Morgan L, Klement E, Novak S, Eliahoo E, Younis A, Abells Sutton G, Abu-Ahmad W, Raz T.
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov 15; 160():10-17. PubMed ID: 30388991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.