These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

106 related items for PubMed ID: 3068061

  • 21. Testing the performance of ECG computer programs: the CSE diagnostic pilot study.
    Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Brohet C, Degani R, Denis B, Graham I, van Herpen G, Macfarlane PW.
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():73-7. PubMed ID: 3694105
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Employment of intra-individual variability to improve computerized ECG interpretation.
    Schijvenaars BJ, Kors JA, van Herpen G, van Bemmel JH.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001 Oct; 84(Pt 1):513-7. PubMed ID: 11604793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. CSE Working Party.
    Willems JL, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Degani R, Macfarlane PW, Zywietz C.
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 2233372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
    Milliken JA, Pipberger H, Pipberger HV, Araoye MA, Ari R, Burggraf GW, Fletcher RD, Katz RJ, Lopez EA, McCans JL, Silver AM.
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Computer-assisted ECG evaluation in polyclinic patients].
    Koenig W, Witzleb EJ, Khatibnia U.
    Fortschr Med; 1981 Jun 25; 99(24):934-6. PubMed ID: 7021376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. CSE database: extended annotations and new recommendations for ECG software testing.
    Smíšek R, Maršánová L, Němcová A, Vítek M, Kozumplík J, Nováková M.
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Aug 25; 55(8):1473-1482. PubMed ID: 28040865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Clinical usefulness of computer diagnosis in automated electrocardiography.
    Endou K, Miyahara H, Sato T.
    Cardiology; 1980 Aug 25; 66(3):174-89. PubMed ID: 6996814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Computer-based interpretation of ECG--guiding or misleading?].
    Morisbak B, Gjesdal K.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Sep 30; 119(23):3441-4. PubMed ID: 10553343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Assessment of the performance of electrocardiographic computer programs with the use of a reference data base.
    Willems JL, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Bourdillon PJ, Brohet C, Dalla Volta S, Andersen JD, Degani R, Denis B, Demeester M.
    Circulation; 1985 Mar 30; 71(3):523-34. PubMed ID: 3838268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Computerized electrocardiographic interpretation: an analysis of clinical utility in 5110 electrocardiograms.
    Thomson A, Mitchell S, Harris PJ.
    Med J Aust; 1989 Oct 16; 151(8):428-30. PubMed ID: 2593957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The concepts of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in evaluation of electrocardiographic, vectorcardiographic and polarcardiographic criteria.
    Rautaharju PM, Blackburn HW, Warren JW.
    J Electrocardiol; 1976 Oct 16; 9(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 781162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department.
    Wathen JE, Rewers AB, Yetman AT, Schaffer MS.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec 16; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography.
    Willems JL.
    J Med Eng Technol; 1985 Dec 16; 9(5):209-17. PubMed ID: 4045988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K, Kanda T, Osada M, Tsunoda Y, Kodajima N, Fukumura Y, Suzuki T, Kobayashi I.
    J Med; 1999 Dec 16; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Computerized serial comparison of electrocardiograms: program performance in myocardial infarction.
    Ariet M, Zhou S, DeLuca DC, Greenfield JC.
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr 16; 40(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 17118395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Automated serial ECG comparison improves computerized interpretation of 12-lead ECG.
    Gregg RE, Deluca DC, Chien CH, Helfenbein ED, Ariet M.
    J Electrocardiol; 2012 Apr 16; 45(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 22995382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [The Caceres-USPHS (version HP-3) computer program. Evaluation of automatic analysis of 40,000 ECG (author's transl)].
    Feruglio GA, Feraco E, Maisano G.
    G Ital Cardiol; 1975 Apr 16; 5(2):262-71. PubMed ID: 1102374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.