These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


229 related items for PubMed ID: 30689241

  • 1. The impact of age on fertility rate in patients who underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy.
    Bolat MS, Kocamanoglu F, Gulsen M, Sengul M, Asci R.
    Andrologia; 2019 May; 51(4):e13234. PubMed ID: 30689241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy for male factor subfertility: ten-year experience.
    Leung L, Ho KL, Tam PC, Yiu MK.
    Hong Kong Med J; 2013 Aug; 19(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 23650197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Varicocelectomy to "upgrade" semen quality to allow couples to use less invasive forms of assisted reproductive technology.
    Samplaski MK, Lo KC, Grober ED, Zini A, Jarvi KA.
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Oct; 108(4):609-612. PubMed ID: 28911932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for infertile couples with advanced female age: natural history in the era of ART.
    O'Brien JH, Bowles B, Kamal KM, Jarvi K, Zini A.
    J Androl; 2004 Oct; 25(6):939-43. PubMed ID: 15477367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fate of Recurrent or Persistent Varicocele in the Era of Assisted Reproduction Technology: Microsurgical Subinguinal Redo Varicocelectomy Versus Observation.
    Çayan S, Akbay E.
    Urology; 2018 Jul; 117():64-69. PubMed ID: 29649543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of Time-dependent Changes in Semen Parameters in Infertile Men After Microsurgical Varicocelectomy.
    Fukuda T, Miyake H, Enatsu N, Matsushita K, Fujisawa M.
    Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 26142582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of varicocelectomies: A meta-analysis.
    Yuan R, Zhuo H, Cao D, Wei Q.
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2017 Apr; 63(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 28301253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of microsurgical varicocelectomy on fertility outcome and treatment plans of patients with severe oligozoospermia: An original report and meta-analysis.
    Majzoub A, ElBardisi H, Covarrubias S, Mak N, Agarwal A, Henkel R, ElSaid S, Al-Malki AH, Arafa M.
    Andrologia; 2021 Jul; 53(6):e14059. PubMed ID: 33763931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microsurgical varicocelectomy for isolated asthenospermia.
    Boman JM, Libman J, Zini A.
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2129-32. PubMed ID: 18804226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Bilateral is superior to unilateral varicocelectomy in infertile males with left clinical and right subclinical varicocele: a prospective randomized controlled study.
    Sun XL, Wang JL, Peng YP, Gao QQ, Song T, Yu W, Xu ZP, Chen Y, Dai YT.
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Feb; 50(2):205-210. PubMed ID: 29210007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Bilateral microsurgical varicocelectomy in infertile men].
    Chovelidze ShG, Tritto J, Getta T.
    Urologiia; 2004 Feb; (3):21-5. PubMed ID: 15199809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in infertile men.
    Jungwirth A, Gögüs C, Hauser G, Gomahr A, Schmeller N, Aulitzky W, Frick J.
    Andrologia; 2001 Mar; 33(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 11350369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Older age is associated with similar improvements in semen parameters and testosterone after subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy.
    Hsiao W, Rosoff JS, Pale JR, Greenwood EA, Goldstein M.
    J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):620-5. PubMed ID: 21168880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Predictors of fertility recovery in subfertile men after varicocelectomy].
    Shomarufov AB, Bozhedomov VA, Akilov FA, Mukhtarov ST, Shavakhabov SS, Abbosov SA, Kamalov AA.
    Urologiia; 2021 Sep; (4):73-78. PubMed ID: 34486278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Men With Severe Oligospermia Appear to Benefit From Varicocele Repair: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    Dubin JM, Greer AB, Kohn TP, Masterson TA, Ji L, Ramasamy R.
    Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():99-103. PubMed ID: 29051002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Initial experience in microsurgical treatment of varicocele: Comparative analysis with conventional macrosurgical varicocelectomy].
    Fernández-Concha Schwalb JJ, Torremadé Barreda J, Suárez Novo JF, Picola Brau N, Vigués Julia F.
    Rev Int Androl; 2021 Jan; 19(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 31982333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of clinical effects of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery.
    Jin L, Yao Q, Wu S, Dai G, Xiang H, Liu X, Xue B.
    Andrologia; 2020 Jul; 52(6):e13605. PubMed ID: 32339320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Outcomes of Microscopic Subinguinal Varicocelectomy With and Without the Assistance of Doppler Ultrasound: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Guo L, Sun W, Shao G, Song H, Ge N, Zhao S, Liu Y, Zhang X, Xiao Z, Yuan M.
    Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):922-8. PubMed ID: 26278823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.