These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
159 related items for PubMed ID: 30702412
1. Fracture Strength of Various Types of Large Direct Composite and Indirect Glass Ceramic Restorations. de Kuijper M, Gresnigt M, van den Houten M, Haumahu D, Schepke U, Cune MS. Oper Dent; 2019; 44(4):433-442. PubMed ID: 30702412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Fracture strength of various types of direct and indirect restorations in the functional repair of endodontically treated molars]. de Kuijper MCFM, Gresnigt MMM, van den Houten M, Haumahu D, Schepke U, Cune MS. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2020 Apr; 127(4):245-253. PubMed ID: 32459220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The fracture strength and the failure mode of lithium disilicate or resin nano ceramics as a crown, overlay, or endocrown restoration on endodontically treated teeth. Vervack V, Johansson C, Coster P, Fokkinga W, Papia E, Vandeweghe S. J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):796-803. PubMed ID: 38152852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Composite Resin Core Buildups With and Without Post for the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Molars Without Ferrule. Magne P, Goldberg J, Edelhoff D, Güth JF. Oper Dent; 2016 May; 41(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 26562093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. Dartora G, Rocha Pereira GK, Varella de Carvalho R, Zucuni CP, Valandro LF, Cesar PF, Caldas RA, Bacchi A. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. Pedrollo Lise D, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Umeda Suzuki TY, Cardoso Vieira LC, Van Meerbeek B. J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical behavior of molars restored with direct and indirect restorations in combination with deep margin elevation. Bresser RA, Carvalho MA, Naves LZ, Melma H, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106459. PubMed ID: 38394767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct or Indirect Restoration of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Central Incisors with Class III Defects? Composite vs Veneer or Crown Restoration. von Stein-Lausnitz M, Mehnert A, Bruhnke M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Spies BC, Bitter K, Naumann M. J Adhes Dent; 2018 Apr; 20(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 30564798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture strength of flared root canals reinforced using different post and core materials. Tsukahara R, Komada W, Oishi S, Yoshimatsu S, Miura H, Fueki K. J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):639-645. PubMed ID: 36270777 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fatigue performance of endodontically treated molars reinforced with different fiber systems. Volom A, Vincze-Bandi E, Sáry T, Alleman D, Forster A, Jakab A, Braunitzer G, Garoushi S, Fráter M. Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):3211-3220. PubMed ID: 36862198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal quality and fracture strength of root-canal treated mandibular molars with overlay restorations after thermocycling and mechanical loading. Dere M, Ozcan M, Göhring TN. J Adhes Dent; 2010 Aug; 12(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 20157656 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture strength of endodontically treated premolars restored with different post systems and metal-ceramic or monolithic zirconia crowns. Mastrogianni A, Lioliou EA, Tortopidis D, Gogos C, Kontonasaki E, Koidis P. Dent Mater J; 2021 May 29; 40(3):606-614. PubMed ID: 33456031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of extensively damaged endodontically treated incisors restored with different types of posts-and-core foundation restoration material. Lazari PC, de Carvalho MA, Del Bel Cury AA, Magne P. J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May 29; 119(5):769-776. PubMed ID: 28923548 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Adhesive restoration of anterior endodontically treated teeth: influence of post length on fracture strength. Ramírez-Sebastià A, Bortolotto T, Cattani-Lorente M, Giner L, Roig M, Krejci I. Clin Oral Investig; 2014 May 29; 18(2):545-54. PubMed ID: 23604697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different endodontic access preparations on the biomechanical behavior of lithium disilicate and resin nanoceramic onlay restorations: An in vitro and 3D finite element analysis study. Lai H, Lin X, Zhang Y, Gong Q, Tong Z. J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan 29; 131(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 35216818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of Preparation Design and Restorative Material on Fatigue and Fracture Strength of Restored Maxillary Premolars. Hofsteenge JW, van den Heijkant IA, Cune MS, Bazos PK, van der Made S, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt M. Oper Dent; 2021 Mar 01; 46(2):E68-E79. PubMed ID: 34192333 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods. Mergulhão VA, de Mendonça LS, de Albuquerque MS, Braz R. Oper Dent; 2019 Mar 01; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]