These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

584 related items for PubMed ID: 30738819

  • 1. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
    Billon R, Hersant B, Bosc R, Meningaud JP.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R, Peintinger F.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Implant-based breast reconstruction with meshes and matrices: biological vs synthetic.
    Jacobs JM, Salzberg CA.
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):211-6. PubMed ID: 25853352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The use of meshes and matrices in breast reconstruction.
    Rolph R, Farhadi J.
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2018 Aug 02; 79(8):454-459. PubMed ID: 30070945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction.
    Karp NS, Salibian AA.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar 01; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
    Woo J, Seung IH, Hong SE.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov 01; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
    Pompei S, Evangelidou D, Arelli F, Ferrante G.
    Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan 01; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 29080661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
    Sorkin M, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Kozlow JH, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec 01; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?
    Heine N, Hoesl V, Seitz S, Prantl L, Brebant V.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Apr 01; 305(4):937-943. PubMed ID: 34554314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative Study of Meshed and Nonmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Maisel Lotan A, Ben Yehuda D, Allweis TM, Scheflan M.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov 01; 144(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 31441807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Urban C, González E, Fornazari A, Berman G, Spautz C, Kuroda F, Furlan Anselmi K, Rabinovich I, Dória M, Nissen L, Schünemann E, Sobreiro B, Lima R.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Nov 01; 150(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 35994351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
    Graziano FD, Lu J, Sbitany H.
    Clin Plast Surg; 2023 Apr 01; 50(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 36813401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prepectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate for Pocket Control without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 4-Year Review.
    Movassaghi K, Gilson A, Stewart CN, Cusic J, Movassaghi A.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jul 01; 154(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 37410610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of Prepectoral Implant Placement and Complete Coverage with TiLoop Bra Mesh for Breast Reconstruction: A Prospective Study on Long-Term and Patient-Reported BREAST-Q Outcomes.
    Casella D, Di Taranto G, Marcasciano M, Sordi S, Kothari A, Kovacs T, Lo Torto F, Cigna E, Calabrese C, Ribuffo D.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jan 01; 143(1):1e-9e. PubMed ID: 30303929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Indications and Controversies for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Utilizing Biological Meshes.
    Zenn MR.
    Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan 01; 45(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 29080660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery.
    Israeli R.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov 01; 130(5 Suppl 2):159S-172S. PubMed ID: 23096966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.