These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

247 related items for PubMed ID: 30777819

  • 1. Proposed modifications to Rule 40d of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1519-1520. PubMed ID: 30777819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Should we alter the way that authorship of a subspecies name that is automatically created under Rule 40d of the Bacteriological Code is cited?
    Tindall BJ, Garrity GM.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 58(Pt 8):1991-2. PubMed ID: 18676496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Introducing the concept of the isonym into the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 May; 69(5):1515-1518. PubMed ID: 30714892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Rule 24b of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and regulating the priority of names and epithets considered to be associated with heterotypic synonyms.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Dec; 69(12):3980-3983. PubMed ID: 31219419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27 (3) and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Opinion 81.
    Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 58(Pt 7):1755-63. PubMed ID: 18599730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clarifying the limitations on Rule 18a and Rule 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 67(2):505-506. PubMed ID: 27902201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The role of incorrect citation of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and subsequent misinterpretation in causing unnecessary nomenclatural confusion.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 69(8):2621-2625. PubMed ID: 31219418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The name Bradyrhizobiaceae Garrity et al. 2006 contains Nitrobacter Winogradsky 1892 (Approved Lists 1980), the nomenclatural type of the family Nitrobacteraceae Buchanan 1917 (Approved Lists 1980), is illegitimate and proposals to alter the wording of Rule 54 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes to clarify the fact that the family name Bradyrhizobiaceae Garrity et al. 2006 is replaced by the family name Nitrobacteraceae Buchanan 1917 (Approved Lists 1980) the only correct name.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 69(8):2609-2611. PubMed ID: 30775963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Commentary on the proposed Section 10 amendments to the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes regarding Candidatus names.
    Whitman WB, Venter SN.
    Syst Appl Microbiol; 2024 Jul; 47(4):126524. PubMed ID: 38878497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A plea for linguistic accuracy - also for Candidatus taxa.
    Oren A.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 67(4):1085-1094. PubMed ID: 27926819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Taking a Closer Look at the Valid Publication and Authorship of Legionella bozemanae Brenner et al. 1980, Fluoribacter bozemanae Garrity et al. 1980, Legionella pittsburghensis Pasculle et al. 1980, Legionella micdadei Hébert et al. 1980 and Tatlockia micdadei (Hébert et al. 1980) Garrity et al. 1980.
    Tindall BJ.
    Curr Microbiol; 2020 Jan; 77(1):146-153. PubMed ID: 31705392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clarifying rule 24a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 58(Pt 7):1779-81. PubMed ID: 18599736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clarifying the definition and role of effective publication in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes with proposals to make changes.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Aug; 69(8):2602-2605. PubMed ID: 30860464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The type strain of Lactobacillus casei is ATCC 393, ATCC 334 cannot serve as the type because it represents a different taxon, the name Lactobacillus paracasei and its subspecies names are not rejected and the revival of the name 'Lactobacillus zeae' contravenes Rules 51b (1) and (2) of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Opinion 82.
    Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Bacteria.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 58(Pt 7):1764-5. PubMed ID: 18599731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 69(1A):S1-S111. PubMed ID: 26596770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Rule 27 of the International Code of Nomenclature of prokaryotes: the basonym is not enough.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4897-4899. PubMed ID: 27488906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The wording and examples given in Rule 47a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes are misleading.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4913-4914. PubMed ID: 27553429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The undesirable retroactive changes to Rule 8 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.
    Tindall BJ.
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 66(11):4895-4896. PubMed ID: 27488867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.