These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


190 related items for PubMed ID: 30794822

  • 1. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates the effect of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on the excitability of spinal reflex.
    Matsugi A, Okada Y.
    Neurosci Res; 2020 Jan; 150():37-43. PubMed ID: 30794822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of spinal motor neurons and vestibulospinal tract in healthy individuals.
    Sato Y, Terasawa Y, Okada Y, Hasui N, Mizuta N, Ohnishi S, Fujita D, Morioka S.
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Oct; 242(10):2381-2390. PubMed ID: 39133291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Do changes in spinal reflex excitability elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation differ based on the site of cerebellar stimulation?
    Matsugi A.
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2018 Jun; 35(2):80-85. PubMed ID: 29732943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Task dependency of the long-latency facilitatory effect on the soleus H-reflex by cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Matsugi A, Mori N, Uehara S, Kamata N, Oku K, Mukai K, Nagano K.
    Neuroreport; 2014 Dec 03; 25(17):1375-80. PubMed ID: 25325350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation on soleus Ia presynaptic and reciprocal inhibition.
    Matsugi A, Mori N, Uehara S, Kamata N, Oku K, Okada Y, Kikuchi Y, Mukai K, Nagano K.
    Neuroreport; 2015 Feb 11; 26(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 25569794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation facilitates excitability of spinal reflex, but does not affect cerebellar inhibition and facilitation in spinocerebellar ataxia.
    Matsugi A, Kikuchi Y, Kaneko K, Seko Y, Odagaki M.
    Neuroreport; 2018 Jul 04; 29(10):808-813. PubMed ID: 29659444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on cerebellar-brain inhibition in humans: A systematic evaluation.
    Batsikadze G, Rezaee Z, Chang DI, Gerwig M, Herlitze S, Dutta A, Nitsche MA, Timmann D.
    Brain Stimul; 2019 Jul 04; 12(5):1177-1186. PubMed ID: 31040077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Anodal Cerebellar Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Facilitation of Propriospinal Neurons in Healthy Humans.
    Chothia M, Doeltgen S, Bradnam LV.
    Brain Stimul; 2016 Jul 04; 9(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 26849999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation modulates the fMRI signal in the cerebellar nuclei in a simple motor task.
    Küper M, Mallick JS, Ernst T, Kraff O, Thürling M, Stefanescu MR, Göricke S, Nitsche MA, Timmann D.
    Brain Stimul; 2019 Jul 04; 12(5):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 30987860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The effect of the anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the cerebellum on the motor cortex excitability.
    Ates MP, Alaydin HC, Cengiz B.
    Brain Res Bull; 2018 Jun 04; 140():114-119. PubMed ID: 29704512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals.
    Takano K, Katagiri N, Sato T, Jin M, Koseki T, Kudo D, Yoshida K, Tanabe S, Tsujikawa M, Kondo K, Yamaguchi T.
    Cerebellum; 2023 Oct 04; 22(5):905-914. PubMed ID: 36053392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Single-Session Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affects Postural Control Learning and Cerebellar Brain Inhibition in Healthy Individuals.
    Katagiri N, Kawakami S, Okuyama S, Koseki T, Kudo D, Namba S, Tanabe S, Yamaguchi T.
    Cerebellum; 2021 Apr 04; 20(2):203-211. PubMed ID: 33108574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.
    Doeltgen SH, Young J, Bradnam LV.
    Cerebellum; 2016 Aug 04; 15(4):466-74. PubMed ID: 26283524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Preconditioning cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates the neuroplastic effect of subsequent anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied during cycling in young adults.
    Pourmajidian M, Lauber B, Sidhu SK.
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan 01; 714():134597. PubMed ID: 31689457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Latency of changes in spinal motoneuron excitability evoked by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in spinal cord injured individuals.
    Alexeeva N, Broton JG, Calancie B.
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Aug 01; 109(4):297-303. PubMed ID: 9751291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Establishing between-session reliability of TMS-conditioned soleus H-reflexes.
    Gray WA, Sabatier MJ, Kesar TM, Borich MR.
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Feb 15; 640():47-52. PubMed ID: 28093306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K, Kim S, Jackson GM, Jackson SR.
    Brain Stimul; 2016 Feb 15; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Rhythmic arm swing enhances long latency facilitatory effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on soleus motoneuron pool excitability.
    Hiraoka K, Akizaki K, Ashida A, Miki M, Okada T, Shin S, Takeno K, Yasuoka M.
    Somatosens Mot Res; 2011 Feb 15; 28(3-4):94-101. PubMed ID: 22115077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of patterned peripheral nerve stimulation on soleus spinal motor neuron excitability.
    Jimenez S, Mordillo-Mateos L, Dileone M, Campolo M, Carrasco-Lopez C, Moitinho-Ferreira F, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Siebner HR, Valls-Solé J, Aguilar J, Oliviero A.
    PLoS One; 2018 Feb 15; 13(2):e0192471. PubMed ID: 29451889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Alter Somatosensory Temporal Discrimination Threshold.
    Ataoğlu EE, Türksoy E, Aslan İ, Boran E, Cengiz B.
    Cerebellum; 2022 Dec 15; 21(6):920-925. PubMed ID: 34718943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.