These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
385 related items for PubMed ID: 30796590
1. Detection and measurements of apical lesions in the upper jaw by cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography as a function of cortical bone thickness. Ketabi AR, Ketabi S, Nabli MB, Lauer HC, Brenner M. Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4067-4073. PubMed ID: 30796590 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of roof visibility of the mandibular canal between cone-beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiograph images as dependent on the cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Ketabi AR, Zelka A, Lauer HC, Hassfeld S. Int J Implant Dent; 2021 May 18; 7(1):39. PubMed ID: 34002304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparison of visibility of the maxillary sinus septa between cone-beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiograph images as dependent on the cortical bone thickness: a retrospective comparative study. Ketabi AR, Hassfeld S, Lauer HC, Piwowarczyk A. Int J Implant Dent; 2024 May 07; 10(1):23. PubMed ID: 38713411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of Crestal Cortical Bone Thickness at Implant Site: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Gupta A, Rathee S, Agarwal J, Pachar RB. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Sep 01; 18(9):785-789. PubMed ID: 28874642 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning. Luangchana P, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S, Kiattavorncharoen S, Jirajariyavej B. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015 Sep 01; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Proximity of mandibular third molar root(s) to surrounding cortical bone: cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and panoramic findings. Wihokrut S, Vorakulpipat C, Manosuthi P, Waikakul A. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun 01; 26(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 34374876 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the visibility and characteristics of the mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography. Sahman H, Sekerci AE, Sisman Y, Payveren M. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014 Jun 01; 29(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 24451856 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative assessment of panoramic radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J, Jacobs R. Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan 01; 18(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 23525890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Souza PC, Willems G. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec 01; 136(6):764.e1-11; discussion 764-5. PubMed ID: 19962592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Efficacy of the Panoramic and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Imaging Methods in the Surgical Planning of the Maxillary All-On-4, M-4, and V-4. Tandogdu E, Ayali A, Caymaz MG. Biomed Res Int; 2022 Dec 01; 2022():1553340. PubMed ID: 35937385 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Potential of Panoramic Radiography and CBCT in Detecting Implant-Related Ex Vivo Injuries of the Inferior Alveolar Canal Border. Sirin Y, Yildirimturk S, Horasan S, Guven K. J Oral Implantol; 2020 Jun 01; 46(3):206-213. PubMed ID: 32030398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of digital panoramic radiography versus cone beam computerized tomography for measuring alveolar bone. Tang Z, Liu X, Chen K. Head Face Med; 2017 Feb 22; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 28228135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of quantitative radiomorphometric predictors of healthy and MRONJ-affected bone using panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT. Aslan E, Onem E, Mert A, Baksi BG. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Sep 01; 53(6):407-416. PubMed ID: 38810135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Evaluating Bone Density and Cortical Bone Thickness at the Implant Site: Micro-Computed Tomography and Histologic Analysis. Suttapreyasri S, Suapear P, Leepong N. J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Nov 01; 29(8):2026-2031. PubMed ID: 29894463 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of radiographical characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of intraosseous jaw lesions on panoramic radiographs and CBCT. Mao WY, Lei J, Lim LZ, Gao Y, Tyndall DA, Fu K. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Feb 01; 50(2):20200165. PubMed ID: 32941743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics and dimensions of the Schneiderian membrane and apical bone in maxillary molars referred for apical surgery: a comparative radiographic analysis using limited cone beam computed tomography. Bornstein MM, Wasmer J, Sendi P, Janner SF, Buser D, von Arx T. J Endod; 2012 Jan 01; 38(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 22152620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of cortical bone thickness using ultrasound. Degen K, Habor D, Radermacher K, Heger S, Kern JS, Wolfart S, Marotti J. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May 01; 28(5):520-528. PubMed ID: 27018152 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A CBCT atlas of buccal cortical bone thickness in interradicular spaces. Holmes PB, Wolf BJ, Zhou J. Angle Orthod; 2015 Nov 01; 85(6):911-9. PubMed ID: 25760885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT as ancillary tools to detect low bone mineral density in post-menopausal women. Kato CN, Tavares NP, Barra SG, Amaral TM, Brasileiro CB, Abreu LG, Mesquita RA. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb 01; 48(2):20180254. PubMed ID: 30306800 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images. Correa LR, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Schropp L, da Silveira HE, Wenzel A. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun 01; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]