These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

428 related items for PubMed ID: 30807542

  • 1. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F, Wendt D, Wassard C, Maas P, Lunner T, Rosenbom T, Holmberg M.
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pupillometry as a Measure of Listening Effort in Patients with Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.
    Gawęcki W, Krzystanek K, Węgrzyniak M, Gibasiewicz R, Wierzbicka M.
    J Clin Med; 2022 Jul 20; 11(14):. PubMed ID: 35887978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug 20; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug 20; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Wendt D, Naylor G, Wang Y, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug 20; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.
    Wendt D, Hietkamp RK, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Aug 20; 38(6):690-700. PubMed ID: 28640038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the Benefits of Bilateral Fitting in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: Spatial Resolution and Memory for Speech.
    Brassington W, Parker R, Bianchi F.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Aug 20; 44(3):530-543. PubMed ID: 36378104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D, Koelewijn T, Książek P, Kramer SE, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov 20; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Nov 20; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Listening Effort Measured With Pupillometry in Cochlear Implant Users Depends on Sound Level, But Not on the Signal to Noise Ratio When Using the Matrix Test.
    Stronks HC, Tops AL, Quach KW, Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Nov 20; 45(6):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 38886888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ, Mylanus EA, Hol MK, Snik AF.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul 20; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparisons of sound processors based on osseointegrated implants in patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F, Caversaccio MD, Kompis M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jul 20; 32(5):728-35. PubMed ID: 21646934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output in Bone Anchored Hearing Systems: A Crossover Study.
    Bergius E, Philipsson M, Rosenbom T, Sadeghi A.
    Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec 01; 42(10):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 34538851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Audiological results with Baha in conductive and mixed hearing loss.
    Pfiffner F, Caversaccio MD, Kompis M.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Dec 01; 71():73-83. PubMed ID: 21389707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Disentangling listening effort and memory load beyond behavioural evidence: Pupillary response to listening effort during a concurrent memory task.
    Zhang Y, Lehmann A, Deroche M.
    PLoS One; 2021 Dec 01; 16(3):e0233251. PubMed ID: 33657100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bilateral use of active middle ear implants: speech discrimination results in noise.
    Wolf-Magele A, Koci V, Schnabl J, Zorowka P, Riechelmann H, Sprinzl GM.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Aug 01; 273(8):2065-72. PubMed ID: 26385811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hearing performance with 2 different high-power sound processors for osseointegrated auditory implants.
    Kurz A, Caversaccio M, Kompis M.
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Jun 01; 34(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 23652327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An exploratory Study of EEG Alpha Oscillation and Pupil Dilation in Hearing-Aid Users During Effortful listening to Continuous Speech.
    Seifi Ala T, Graversen C, Wendt D, Alickovic E, Whitmer WM, Lunner T.
    PLoS One; 2020 Jun 01; 15(7):e0235782. PubMed ID: 32649733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
    Marino R, Linton N, Eikelboom RH, Statham E, Rajan GP.
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr 01; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.