These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

205 related items for PubMed ID: 30853580

  • 1. Chewing simulation of zirconia implant supported restorations.
    Rohr N, Balmer M, Müller JA, Märtin S, Fischer J.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jul; 63(3):361-367. PubMed ID: 30853580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant.
    Rohr N, Brunner S, Märtin S, Fischer J.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):138-145. PubMed ID: 28461047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Monolithic Zirconia Crowns Supported by Titanium and Ti-Base Abutments: The Effect of Chewing Simulation and Thermocyclic Aging.
    Yavuz A, Büyükerkmen EB.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 Jan; 38(2):328-333. PubMed ID: 37083917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
    Taha D, Sabet A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
    Weyhrauch M, Igiel C, Scheller H, Weibrich G, Lehmann KM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Jul; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fracture strength of implant-supported monolithic crowns after aging in a mastication simulator.
    Şalvarlı KC, Talay Çevlik E.
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2023 Feb 03; 18(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 36734424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biofilm formation on restorative materials and resin composite cements.
    Astasov-Frauenhoffer M, Glauser S, Fischer J, Schmidli F, Waltimo T, Rohr N.
    Dent Mater; 2018 Nov 03; 34(11):1702-1709. PubMed ID: 30220506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Correlations between fracture load of zirconia implant supported single crowns and mechanical properties of restorative material and cement.
    Rohr N, Märtin S, Fischer J.
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar 30; 37(2):222-228. PubMed ID: 29176305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage of thin-walled monolithic zirconia and polymer-containing CAD-CAM crowns.
    Schlenz MA, Fiege C, Schmidt A, Wöstmann B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb 30; 125(2):316-322. PubMed ID: 32151385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator.
    Bankoğlu Güngör M, Karakoca Nemli S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar 30; 119(3):473-480. PubMed ID: 28645670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fracture Resistance of Molar Crowns Fabricated with Monolithic All-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Cemented on Titanium Abutments: An In Vitro Study.
    Dogan DO, Gorler O, Mutaf B, Ozcan M, Eyuboglu GB, Ulgey M.
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun 30; 26(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 26618513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
    Pitta J, Hicklin SP, Fehmer V, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC, Sailer I.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019 Jun 30; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA, Sherif RM.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan 30; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In vitro performance and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated implant supported molar crowns.
    Rosentritt M, Hahnel S, Engelhardt F, Behr M, Preis V.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May 30; 21(4):1213-1219. PubMed ID: 27370027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fracture load of zirconia implant supported CAD/CAM resin crowns and mechanical properties of restorative material and cement.
    Rohr N, Märtin S, Fischer J.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct 15; 65(4):502-508. PubMed ID: 33840705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fracture load and chewing simulation of zirconia and stainless-steel crowns for primary molars.
    Kist S, Stawarczyk B, Kollmuss M, Hickel R, Huth KC.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2019 Aug 15; 127(4):369-375. PubMed ID: 31293020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.
    Aboushelib MN, Elsafi MH.
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr 15; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.
    Mitsias M, Koutayas SO, Wolfart S, Kern M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun 15; 25(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23106096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements.
    Sellers K, Powers JM, Kiat-Amnuay S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb 15; 117(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 27677215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Loading capacity of zirconia implant supported hybrid ceramic crowns.
    Rohr N, Coldea A, Zitzmann NU, Fischer J.
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec 15; 31(12):e279-88. PubMed ID: 26458762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.