These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 30882535

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
    Rogers AR, Burke SR, Kopun JG, Tan H, Neely ST, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.
    Reuven ML, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Rasetshwane DM, Allen JB, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Aug; 34(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 24165303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.
    Burke SR, Rogers AR, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 20458246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.
    Charaziak KK, Shera CA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):515. PubMed ID: 28147590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
    Dewey JB, Dhar S.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 27681700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.
    Richmond SA, Kopun JG, Neely ST, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3134-40. PubMed ID: 21568416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Negative Middle Ear Pressure and Composite and Component Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Thompson S, Henin S, Long GR.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Dec; 36(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 26049553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions.
    Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
    Dreisbach L, Zettner E, Chang Liu M, Meuel Fernhoff C, MacPhee I, Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Sep; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3200-14. PubMed ID: 8550945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reliable Long-Term Serial Evaluation of Cochlear Function Using Pulsed Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions: Analyzing Levels and Pressure Time Courses.
    Bader K, Dalhoff E, Dierkes L, Braun LH, Gummer AW, Zelle D.
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 45(5):1326-1338. PubMed ID: 38809242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.