These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
337 related items for PubMed ID: 30883236
1. Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth. Rathi NV, Khatri AA, Agrawal AG, M SB, Thosar NR, Deolia SG. Anesth Prog; 2019; 66(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30883236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial. Bahrololoomi Z, Maghsoudi N. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 34853915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Kanaa MD, Whitworth JM, Meechan JG. J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study. Nydegger B, Nusstein J, Reader A, Drum M, Beck M. J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Infiltrative local anesthesia with articaine is equally as effective as inferior alveolar nerve block with lidocaine for the removal of erupted molars. Venkat Narayanan J, Gurram P, Krishnan R, Muthusubramanian V, Sadesh Kannan V. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 21(3):295-299. PubMed ID: 28547078 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]