These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
210 related items for PubMed ID: 30888681
1. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography for mandibular morphometry. Tassoker M, Akin D, Aydin Kabakci AD, Sener S. Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2019; 78(4):862-870. PubMed ID: 30888681 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The comparison of roof visibility of the mandibular canal between cone-beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiograph images as dependent on the cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Ketabi AR, Zelka A, Lauer HC, Hassfeld S. Int J Implant Dent; 2021 May 18; 7(1):39. PubMed ID: 34002304 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of experimental phantoms to determine the accuracy and reliability of mandibular cortical width measurements by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Hayashi Y, Ito M, Imanishi Y, Watanabe K, Matsumoto K, Arai Y, Honda K. J Oral Sci; 2020 Jun 23; 62(3):303-307. PubMed ID: 32522912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of mandibular index values determined from standard panoramic versus cone beam computed tomography reconstructed images. Koseoglu Secgin C, Gulsahi A, Yavuz Y, Kamburoglu K. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Mar 23; 127(3):257-264. PubMed ID: 30497908 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the morphological changes in the mandible for dentate and totally edentate elderly population using cone-beam computed tomography. Tozoğlu U, Cakur B. Surg Radiol Anat; 2014 Sep 23; 36(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 24292424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandibular incisive canal in Han Chinese using cone beam computed tomography. Kong N, Hui M, Miao F, Yuan H, Du Y, Chen N. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep 23; 45(9):1142-6. PubMed ID: 27184354 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of quantitative radiomorphometric predictors of healthy and MRONJ-affected bone using panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT. Aslan E, Onem E, Mert A, Baksi BG. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Sep 01; 53(6):407-416. PubMed ID: 38810135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals by cone beam computed tomography. Villaça-Carvalho MF, Manhães LR, de Moraes ME, Lopes SL. Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep 01; 20(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 27417545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationships between third-molar juxta-apical radiolucencies and mandibular canals in panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images. Kapila R, Harada N, Araki K, Sano T, Goto TK. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 May 01; 117(5):640-644. PubMed ID: 24725991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning. Luangchana P, Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S, Kiattavorncharoen S, Jirajariyavej B. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015 May 01; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. To Assess and Evaluate the Variation of Mandibular Anatomy Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Before Planning an Implant Surgery: A Population-based Retrospective Study. Kapoor V, Kumar N, Dahiya K, Sikka R, Sirana P, Singh A. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov 01; 19(11):1381-1385. PubMed ID: 30602645 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship between CBCT and panoramic images of the morphology and angulation of the posterior mandibular jaw bone. Çiftçi ME, Aktan AM, İşman Ö, Yıldırım E. Surg Radiol Anat; 2016 Apr 01; 38(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 26370261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The growth of Medicare rebatable cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in Australia. Brown LF, Monsour P. Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec 01; 60(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 25366248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]