These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

307 related items for PubMed ID: 30894159

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Long-term visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for low myopia.
    Fu M, Li M, Wei R, Zhang C, Huang Y, Niu L, Wang X, Zhang H, Zhou X.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug 18; 22(1):347. PubMed ID: 35978275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Visual Quality After SMILE and LASEK for Mild to Moderate Myopia.
    Yu M, Chen M, Wang B, Zou L, Zhu X, Dai J.
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Dec 18; 31(12):795-800. PubMed ID: 26653723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the posterior corneal elevation and biomechanics after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short- and long-term observation.
    Yu M, Chen M, Dai J.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar 18; 257(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 30643965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Aberration compensation between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after Small incision lenticule extraction and Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis.
    Li X, Wang Y, Dou R.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep 18; 35(5):540-51. PubMed ID: 26087672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.
    Lim SA, Park Y, Cheong YJ, Na KS, Joo CK.
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr 18; 30(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 27051256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis.
    Chen M, Yu M, Dai J.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov 18; 94(7):e586-e591. PubMed ID: 27130377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Chung SH, Lee IS, Lee YG, Lee HK, Kim EK, Yoon G, Seo KY.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May 18; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Corneal higher-order aberrations of the anterior surface, posterior surface, and total cornea after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): high myopia versus mild to moderate myopia.
    Jin HY, Wan T, Yu XN, Wu F, Yao K.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov 12; 18(1):295. PubMed ID: 30419871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome.
    Zhu X, Zou L, Yu M, Qiu C, Chen M, Dai J.
    PLoS One; 2017 Nov 12; 12(8):e0182251. PubMed ID: 28771544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) for myopia.
    Li M, Li M, Chen Y, Miao H, Yang D, Ni K, Zhou X.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 May 12; 97(3):e373-e380. PubMed ID: 30632671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
    Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y.
    J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr 12; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24702576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Retrospective analysis of changes in the anterior corneal surface after Q value guided LASIK and LASEK in high myopic astigmatism for 3 years.
    Huang H, Yang J, Bao H, Chen S, Xia B, Zou J.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun 18; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22708970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.
    Zhou J, Gu W, Li S, Wu L, Gao Y, Guo X.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan 18; 40(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 31571091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.
    Lee K, Ahn JM, Kim EK, Kim TI.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep 18; 251(9):2163-9. PubMed ID: 23652467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.