These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
262 related items for PubMed ID: 30920083
21. Anti-biofilm effects and healing promotion by silver oxynitrate-based dressings. Doherty C, Byrne CV, Baqader S, El-Chami C, McBain AJ, Thomason HA. Sci Rep; 2023 Feb 03; 13(1):2014. PubMed ID: 36737464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation on wound dressings. Brandenburg KS, Calderon DF, Kierski PR, Brown AL, Shah NM, Abbott NL, Schurr MJ, Murphy CJ, McAnulty JF, Czuprynski CJ. Wound Repair Regen; 2015 Feb 03; 23(6):842-54. PubMed ID: 26342168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Antimicrobial activity of a bioelectric dressing using an in vitro wound pathogen colony drip-flow reactor biofilm model. Kim H, Izadjoo M. J Wound Care; 2016 Jul 01; 25(Sup7):S47-S52. PubMed ID: 29027847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Enhanced Performance and Mode of Action of a Novel Antibiofilm Hydrofiber® Wound Dressing. Parsons D, Meredith K, Rowlands VJ, Short D, Metcalf DG, Bowler PG. Biomed Res Int; 2016 Jul 01; 2016():7616471. PubMed ID: 27990437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical and Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Silver Foam Dressing With Silicone Adhesive in Diabetic Foot Ulcers With Mild Infection. Lázaro-Martínez JL, Álvaro-Afonso FJ, Sevillano-Fernández D, Molines-Barroso RJ, García-Álvarez Y, García-Morales E. Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2019 Sep 01; 18(3):269-278. PubMed ID: 31379224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. An in vitro model of chronic wound biofilms to test wound dressings and assess antimicrobial susceptibilities. Hill KE, Malic S, McKee R, Rennison T, Harding KG, Williams DW, Thomas DW. J Antimicrob Chemother; 2010 Jun 01; 65(6):1195-206. PubMed ID: 20378671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Collagen-based wound dressing for doxycycline delivery: in-vivo evaluation in an infected excisional wound model in rats. Adhirajan N, Shanmugasundaram N, Shanmuganathan S, Babu M. J Pharm Pharmacol; 2009 Dec 01; 61(12):1617-23. PubMed ID: 19958583 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants. Phillips PL, Yang Q, Davis S, Sampson EM, Azeke JI, Hamad A, Schultz GS. Int Wound J; 2015 Aug 01; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Antibiofilm Potential of Silver Sulfadiazine-Loaded Nanoparticle Formulations: A Study on the Effect of DNase-I on Microbial Biofilm and Wound Healing Activity. Patel KK, Surekha DB, Tripathi M, Anjum MM, Muthu MS, Tilak R, Agrawal AK, Singh S. Mol Pharm; 2019 Sep 03; 16(9):3916-3925. PubMed ID: 31318574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Topical application of Lactobacilli successfully eradicates Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and promotes wound healing in chronic wounds. Li Z, Zhang S, Zuber F, Altenried S, Jaklenec A, Langer R, Ren Q. Microbes Infect; 2023 Sep 03; 25(8):105176. PubMed ID: 37406851 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo. Fitzgerald DJ, Renick PJ, Forrest EC, Tetens SP, Earnest DN, McMillan J, Kiedaisch BM, Shi L, Roche ED. Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan 03; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm-infected wounds with clinical wound care strategies: a quantitative study using an in vivo rabbit ear model. Seth AK, Geringer MR, Gurjala AN, Hong SJ, Galiano RD, Leung KP, Mustoe TA. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Feb 03; 129(2):262e-274e. PubMed ID: 22286442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Immune Modulating Topical S100A8/A9 Inhibits Growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Mitigates Biofilm Infection in Chronic Wounds. Trøstrup H, Lerche CJ, Christophersen L, Jensen PØ, Høiby N, Moser C. Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Jun 26; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 28672877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Development, characterization, and evaluation of a simple polymicrobial colony biofilm model for testing of antimicrobial wound dressings. Robertson SN, Romero M, Fenn S, Kohler Riedi PL, Cámara M. J Appl Microbiol; 2024 Mar 01; 135(3):. PubMed ID: 38366933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Treatment with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Glycoside Hydrolase PslG Combats Wound Infection by Improving Antibiotic Efficacy and Host Innate Immune Activity. Pestrak MJ, Baker P, Dellos-Nolan S, Hill PJ, Passos da Silva D, Silver H, Lacdao I, Raju D, Parsek MR, Wozniak DJ, Howell PL. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2019 Jun 01; 63(6):. PubMed ID: 30988141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Efficacy of a surfactant-based wound dressing on biofilm control. Percival SL, Mayer D, Salisbury AM. Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep 01; 25(5):767-773. PubMed ID: 28857343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro comparison of antimicrobial activity of iodine and silver dressings against biofilms. Thorn RM, Austin AJ, Greenman J, Wilkins JP, Davis PJ. J Wound Care; 2009 Aug 01; 18(8):343-6. PubMed ID: 19862874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Noncontact, low-frequency ultrasound as an effective therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected biofilm wounds. Seth AK, Nguyen KT, Geringer MR, Hong SJ, Leung KP, Mustoe TA, Galiano RD. Wound Repair Regen; 2013 Aug 01; 21(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 23421692 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Controlled-release iodine foam dressings demonstrate broad-spectrum biofilm management in several in vitro models. Salisbury AM, Mullin M, Foulkes L, Chen R, Percival SL. Int Wound J; 2022 Nov 01; 19(7):1717-1728. PubMed ID: 35166016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]