These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Student participation: to the benefit of both the student and the faculty. Dhaese SA, Van de Caveye I, Bussche PV, Bogaert S, De Maeseneer J. Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 26261120 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of student feedback to drive quality improvement (QI) in a preclinical U.S. medical school course. Richman PS, Olvet DM, Ahmad S, Chandran L. Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1583968. PubMed ID: 30810513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Muller JH, Jain S, Loeser H, Irby DM. Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):778-85. PubMed ID: 18627445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An anticipatory quality improvement process for curricular reform. Hollander H, Loeser H, Irby D. Acad Med; 2002 Sep; 77(9):930. PubMed ID: 12228101 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Successful peer review of courses: a case study. Horowitz S, Van Eyck S, Albanese M. Acad Med; 1998 Mar; 73(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 9526453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Using the tool for assessing cultural competence training (TACCT) to measure faculty and medical student perceptions of cultural competence instruction in the first three years of the curriculum. Lie D, Boker J, Cleveland E. Acad Med; 2006 Jun; 81(6):557-64. PubMed ID: 16728806 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Student engagement in medical education: A mixed-method study on medical students as module co-directors in curriculum development. Milles LS, Hitzblech T, Drees S, Wurl W, Arends P, Peters H. Med Teach; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 31203695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]