These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1079 related items for PubMed ID: 30933704

  • 1. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B, Klenzner T, Oehler M.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of early and late reflections on intelligibility of reverberated speech by cochlear implant listeners.
    Hu Y, Kokkinakis K.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL22-8. PubMed ID: 24437852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.
    Lee J, Ali H, Ziaei A, Tobey EA, Hansen JHL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2788. PubMed ID: 28464686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.
    Roy AT, Jiradejvong P, Carver C, Limb CJ.
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 23172009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ, Kreft HA.
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct 13; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL, Delhorne LA, Braida LD, Reed CM.
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar 13; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change.
    Stilp CE, Goupell MJ, Kluender KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb 13; 133(2):EL136-41. PubMed ID: 23363194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of adaptive dynamic range optimization in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implants.
    Ali H, Hazrati O, Tobey EA, Hansen JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep 13; 136(3):EL242. PubMed ID: 25190428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y, Escabí M, Litovsky RY.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug 13; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Blind binary masking for reverberation suppression in cochlear implants.
    Hazrati O, Lee J, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar 13; 133(3):1607-14. PubMed ID: 23464030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC, Picou EM, Steffens T.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar 13; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.
    Goehring T, Bolner F, Monaghan JJ, van Dijk B, Zarowski A, Bleeck S.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 13; 344():183-194. PubMed ID: 27913315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct 13; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Simultaneous suppression of noise and reverberation in cochlear implants using a ratio masking strategy.
    Hazrati O, Sadjadi SO, Loizou PC, Hansen JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov 13; 134(5):3759-65. PubMed ID: 24180786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants.
    Liepins R, Kaider A, Honeder C, Auinger AB, Dahm V, Riss D, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2020 Jul 13; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 54.