These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 30933705

  • 1. Adaptation to noise in amplitude modulation detection without the medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Marrufo-Pérez MI, Eustaquio-Martín A, Fumero MJ, Gorospe JM, Polo R, Gutiérrez Revilla A, Lopez-Poveda EA.
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():133-141. PubMed ID: 30933705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M, Krüger B, Büchner A, Lenarz T, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.
    Chatterjee M, Kulkarni AM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1117. PubMed ID: 29495705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Unrelated to the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Marrufo-Pérez MI, Eustaquio-Martín A, Lopez-Poveda EA.
    J Neurosci; 2018 Apr 25; 38(17):4138-4145. PubMed ID: 29593051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T.
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb 25; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA, Eustaquio-Martín A, Stohl JS, Wolford RD, Schatzer R, Wilson BS.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Feb 25; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B, Büchner A, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep 25; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL, Boymans M, van Dijk B, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov 25; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.
    Zhou X, Li H, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ, Yuan W.
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Nov 25; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.