These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

209 related items for PubMed ID: 3093645

  • 21. Computerization of patient acuity and nursing care planning. New approach to improved patient care and cost-effective staffing.
    Adams R, Duchene P.
    J Nurs Adm; 1985 Apr; 15(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 3845089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The ICD-9-CM DRGs: increased homogeneity through use of AS-SCORE.
    Panniers TL, Tomkiewicz ZM.
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Feb; 11(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 3920601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. DRGs and nursing workload measures.
    Giovannetti P.
    Comput Nurs; 1985 Feb; 3(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 3921223
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Evaluating the first German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) in cardiological patients: problems in the correct medical and economic grouping].
    Reinecke H, Bunzemeier H, Fürstenberg T, Rothenburger M, Böcker D, Scheld HH, Breithardt G, Roeder N.
    Z Kardiol; 2003 Jul; 92(7):581-94. PubMed ID: 12883843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Nursing cost by DRG: nursing intensity weights.
    Knauf RA, Ballard K, Mossman PN, Lichtig LK.
    Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 17242393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Nursing: a major hospital cost component.
    Wilson L, Prescott PA, Aleksandrowicz L.
    Health Serv Res; 1988 Feb; 22(6):773-96. PubMed ID: 3126163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Management of nursing intensity.
    Thompson JD, Diers D.
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):473-92. PubMed ID: 3138665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Finding the productivity standard in your acuity system.
    Nauert LB, Leach KM, Watson PM.
    J Nurs Adm; 1988 Jan; 18(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 3339455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Variable billing for services: new fiscal direction for nursing.
    Higgerson NJ, Van Slyck A.
    J Nurs Adm; 1982 Jun; 12(6):20-7. PubMed ID: 6919572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Multiple shift patient classification: is it necessary?
    Kinley J, Cronenwett LR.
    J Nurs Adm; 1987 Feb; 17(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 3102705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The severity of illness index: an interview with Susan D. Horn.
    Horn SD.
    Health Care Strateg Manage; 1985 Mar; 3(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10311010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Building a classification system that works.
    Unger J.
    J Nurs Adm; 1985 Mar; 15(7-8):18-24. PubMed ID: 3926964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.