These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

151 related items for PubMed ID: 30945131

  • 1. Comparing internet and face-to-face surveys as methods for eliciting preferences for social care-related quality of life: evidence from England using the ASCOT service user measure.
    Saloniki EC, Malley J, Burge P, Lu H, Batchelder L, Linnosmaa I, Trukeschitz B, Forder J.
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2207-2220. PubMed ID: 30945131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Valuing informal carers' quality of life using best-worst scaling-Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer).
    Nguyen L, Jokimäki H, Linnosmaa I, Saloniki EC, Batchelder L, Malley J, Lu H, Burge P, Trukeschitz B, Forder J.
    Eur J Health Econ; 2022 Apr; 23(3):357-374. PubMed ID: 34468882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Do You Prefer Safety to Social Participation? Finnish Population-Based Preference Weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) for Service Users.
    Nguyen L, Jokimäki H, Linnosmaa I, Saloniki EC, Batchelder L, Malley J, Lu H, Burge P, Trukeschitz B, Forder J.
    MDM Policy Pract; 2021 Apr; 6(2):23814683211027902. PubMed ID: 34291174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Japanese preference weights of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for Carers (ASCOT-Carer).
    Shiroiwa T, Nakamura-Thomas H, Yamaguchi M, Morikawa M, Moriyama Y, Fukuda T, Allan S, Malley J.
    Qual Life Res; 2022 Jul; 31(7):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 35020110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Development of Japanese utility weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) SCT4.
    Shiroiwa T, Moriyama Y, Nakamura-Thomas H, Morikawa M, Fukuda T, Batchelder L, Saloniki EC, Malley J.
    Qual Life Res; 2020 Jan; 29(1):253-263. PubMed ID: 31485915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.
    Netten A, Burge P, Malley J, Potoglou D, Towers AM, Brazier J, Flynn T, Forder J, Wall B.
    Health Technol Assess; 2012 Jan; 16(16):1-166. PubMed ID: 22459668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. What's important when caring for a loved one? Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for informal carers (ASCOT-Carer) for Austria.
    Trukeschitz B, Hajji A, Batchelder L, Saloniki E, Linnosmaa I, Malley J.
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1975-1984. PubMed ID: 33598854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) for service users for Austria: Findings from a best-worst experiment.
    Hajji A, Trukeschitz B, Malley J, Batchelder L, Saloniki E, Linnosmaa I, Lu H.
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Jan 07; 250():112792. PubMed ID: 32114259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England.
    Rand S, Malley J, Towers AM, Netten A, Forder J.
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Aug 18; 15(1):163. PubMed ID: 28821303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Eliciting patient preferences, priorities and trade-offs for outcomes following kidney transplantation: a pilot best-worst scaling survey.
    Howell M, Wong G, Rose J, Tong A, Craig JC, Howard K.
    BMJ Open; 2016 Jan 25; 6(1):e008163. PubMed ID: 26810994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Impact of Survey Administration Mode on the Results of a Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiment: Online and Paper Comparison.
    Determann D, Lambooij MS, Steyerberg EW, de Bekker-Grob EW, de Wit GA.
    Value Health; 2017 Jan 25; 20(7):953-960. PubMed ID: 28712625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of Modes of Administration and Alternative Formats for Eliciting Societal Preferences for Burden of Illness.
    Rowen D, Brazier J, Keetharuth A, Tsuchiya A, Mukuria C.
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Feb 25; 14(1):89-104. PubMed ID: 26445967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people.
    Malley JN, Towers AM, Netten AP, Brazier JE, Forder JE, Flynn T.
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2012 Feb 10; 10():21. PubMed ID: 22325334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.
    Koffman J, Yorganci E, Murtagh F, Yi D, Gao W, Barclay S, Pickles A, Higginson I, Johnson H, Wilson R, Bailey S, Ewart C, Evans C.
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Oct 10; 23(55):1-150. PubMed ID: 31594555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Developing adolescent-specific health state values for economic evaluation: an application of profile case best-worst scaling to the Child Health Utility 9D.
    Ratcliffe J, Flynn T, Terlich F, Stevens K, Brazier J, Sawyer M.
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Aug 01; 30(8):713-27. PubMed ID: 22788261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Measuring the outcomes of long-term care for unpaid carers: comparing the ASCOT-Carer, Carer Experience Scale and EQ-5D-3 L.
    Rand S, Malley J, Vadean F, Forder J.
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2019 Dec 16; 17(1):184. PubMed ID: 31842952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
    Whitty JA, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Scuffham PA.
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul 16; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Valuing Child Health Utility 9D health states with a young adolescent sample: a feasibility study to compare best-worst scaling discrete-choice experiment, standard gamble and time trade-off methods.
    Ratcliffe J, Couzner L, Flynn T, Sawyer M, Stevens K, Brazier J, Burgess L.
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2011 Jul 16; 9(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 21033766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.