These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

92 related items for PubMed ID: 3096245

  • 21. [Noninvasive assessment of an aortic bioprosthesis malfunction with Doppler echocardiography].
    Fischer JL, Henselmann L.
    Z Kardiol; 1987 May; 76(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 3617871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Echodoppler evaluation of the normally functioning Saint-Jude's aortic valve prosthesis].
    Lesbre JP, Guillaumont MP, Dallocchio M, Roudaut R, Tribouilloy C, Choquet D.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Sep; 83(10):1553-61. PubMed ID: 2122832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Assessment of valvular lesions with M-mode, two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography.
    Quinones MA.
    Herz; 1984 Aug; 9(4):200-12. PubMed ID: 6479830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Doppler echocardiographic measurement of flow velocity in cases with a Björk-Shiley aortic prosthesis and diagnosis of prosthetic valve dysfunction].
    Miyazawa S, Matsui M, Sasaki T, Takakura H, Miyamoto N, Kuwata M, Arai T.
    Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 38(6):953-9. PubMed ID: 2398291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Comparison of pulsed and continuous Doppler techniques for the evaluation of left ventricular stenoses].
    Veyrat C, Sebaoun G, Gramage JY, Dumora P, Gourtchiglouian C, Kalmanson D.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1985 Oct; 78(10):1473-83. PubMed ID: 3938213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac valve prostheses.
    Kotler MN, Goldman A, Parry WR.
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1986 Oct; 17(1):201-41. PubMed ID: 3768920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Doppler echocardiography in the evaluation of prosthetic valve function].
    Kalimanovska-Ostrić D, Svetković-Matić D, Avramović D.
    Glas Srp Akad Nauka Med; 1991 Oct; (40):83-91. PubMed ID: 1916433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Evaluation of new pericardial bioprostheses by pulsed and continuous Doppler ultrasound ].
    Lesbre JP, Chassat C, Lespérance J, Petitclerc R, Bonan R, Dyrda I, Pasternac A, Bourassa M.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Sep; 79(10):1439-48. PubMed ID: 3099678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Present possibilities of quantitative doppler echocardiography using pulsed and continuous technics. I. Evaluation of valvular defects and functioning of valvular prostheses].
    Stárek A, Niederle P.
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1989 May 19; 128(21):647-51. PubMed ID: 2758451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Normal values of valvular flow velocities determined by Doppler echocardiography: relations with heart rate and age].
    Evangelista A, García del Castillo H, González-Alujas T, Brotons C, García-Dorado D, Soler-Soler J.
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 1996 Mar 19; 49(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 8685522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [Value and limitations of transthoracic Doppler echocardiography in the diagnosis of thromboses of mechanical valve prosthesis. Report of 19 cases].
    Roudaut R, Gosse P, Basto L, Reynaud P, Leherissier A, Dallocchio M.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1990 Aug 19; 83(9):1417-22. PubMed ID: 2122860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.