These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

466 related items for PubMed ID: 30973834

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty.
    O'Reilly EB, Barnett S, Madden C, Welch B, Mickey B, Rozen S.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Mar; 68(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 25541423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
    Asaad M, Taslakian EN, Banuelos J, Abu-Ghname A, Bite U, Mardini S, Van Gompel JJ, Sharaf B.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 32(1):193-197. PubMed ID: 33074970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Outcomes of Cranioplasty Strategies for High-Risk Complex Cranial Defects: A 10-Year Experience.
    Soto E, Restrepo RD, Grant JH, Myers RP.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Jun 01; 88(5 Suppl 5):S449-S454. PubMed ID: 34670972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Complications and Failures of Autologous Heterotopic Cranial Bone versus Alloplastic Cranioplasties.
    Oberoi MK, Mirzaie S, Huang KX, Caprini RM, Hu VJ, Dejam D, Ge S, Cronin BJ, Pfaff MJ, Lee JC.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Oct 01; 154(4):757e-772e. PubMed ID: 37749784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
    Ng ZY, Nawaz I.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan 01; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
    Jaberi J, Gambrell K, Tiwana P, Madden C, Finn R.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb 01; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A Large Multicenter Retrospective Research on Embedded Cranioplasty and Covered Cranioplasty.
    Zhang Q, Yuan Y, Li X, Sun T, Zhou Y, Yu H, Guan J.
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr 01; 112():e645-e651. PubMed ID: 29374612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for repair of craniofacial defects.
    Rammos CK, Cayci C, Castro-Garcia JA, Feiz-Erfan I, Lettieri SC.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May 01; 26(3):631-3. PubMed ID: 25901667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Exploring complications following cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy: A retrospective bicenter assessment of autologous, PMMA and CAD implants.
    Pfnür A, Tosin D, Petkov M, Sharon O, Mayer B, Wirtz CR, Knoll A, Pala A.
    Neurosurg Rev; 2024 Jan 29; 47(1):72. PubMed ID: 38285230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Craniofacial reconstruction using patient-specific implants polyether ether ketone with computer-assisted planning.
    Manrique OJ, Lalezarzadeh F, Dayan E, Shin J, Buchbinder D, Smith M.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 May 29; 26(3):663-6. PubMed ID: 25974770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.