These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

172 related items for PubMed ID: 30989596

  • 1. Quantitative analysis of effects of the grid specifications on the quality of digital radiography images.
    Lee S, Chung W.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Jun; 42(2):553-561. PubMed ID: 30989596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep 21; 52(18):5545-68. PubMed ID: 17804881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of digital radiography systems in terms of effective detective quantum efficiency.
    Bertolini M, Nitrosi A, Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Pattacini P, Ginocchi V, Iori M.
    Med Phys; 2012 May 21; 39(5):2617-27. PubMed ID: 22559632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effective detective quantum efficiency for two mammography systems: measurement and comparison against established metrics.
    Salvagnini E, Bosmans H, Struelens L, Marshall NW.
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct 21; 40(10):101916. PubMed ID: 24089918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A comprehensive model for x-ray projection imaging system efficiency and image quality characterization in the presence of scattered radiation.
    Monnin P, Verdun FR, Bosmans H, Pérez SR, Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun 23; 62(14):5691-5722. PubMed ID: 28557801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW, Monnin P, Bosmans H, Bochud FO, Verdun FR.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul 21; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A new stationary grid, with grid lines aligned to pixel lines with submicron-order precision, to suppress grid artifacts.
    Kawashima H, Ichikawa K, Iida Y.
    Med Phys; 2021 Sep 21; 48(9):4935-4943. PubMed ID: 34270103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
    Nano TF, Escartin T, Ismailova E, Karim KS, Lindström J, Kim HK, Cunningham IA.
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep 21; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T, Peppard H, Williams MB.
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr 21; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug 07; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
    Fetterly KA, Schueler BA.
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug 21; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A, Padovani R, Quai E, Vano E, Prieto C, Aviles P.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Aug 21; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA, Schueler BA.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan 21; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Characterizing a novel scintillating glass for application to megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography.
    Hu YH, Shedlock D, Wang A, Rottmann J, Baturin P, Myronakis M, Huber P, Fueglistaller R, Shi M, Morf D, Star-Lack J, Berbeco RI.
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar 21; 46(3):1323-1330. PubMed ID: 30586163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW, Mackenzie A, Honey ID.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb 21; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW, Lemmens K, Bosmans H.
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb 21; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.