These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1556 related items for PubMed ID: 31005531

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion.
    Yang DH, Kim YH, Roh JH, Kang JW, Ahn JM, Kweon J, Lee JB, Choi SH, Shin ES, Park DW, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ, Lim TH.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr 01; 18(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 27354345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Real World Utilization of Computed Tomography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Single Center Experience in the United States.
    Fares A, Alaiti MA, Alkhalil A, Al-Kindi S, Chami T, Martin B, Thakker P, Nadeem F, Rajagopalan S, Simon D, Gilkeson R, Bezerra HG.
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Dec 01; 20(12):1043-1047. PubMed ID: 30833210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a sub-group analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies.
    Nakanishi R, Matsumoto S, Alani A, Li D, Kitslaar PH, Broersen A, Koo BK, Min JK, Budoff MJ.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug 01; 31(6):1251-9. PubMed ID: 25904402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Trans-lesional fractional flow reserve gradient as derived from coronary CT improves patient management: ADVANCE registry.
    Takagi H, Leipsic JA, McNamara N, Martin I, Fairbairn TA, Akasaka T, Nørgaard BL, Berman DS, Chinnaiyan K, Hurwitz-Koweek LM, Pontone G, Kawasaki T, Rønnow Sand NP, Jensen JM, Amano T, Poon M, Øvrehus KA, Sonck J, Rabbat MG, Mullen S, De Bruyne B, Rogers C, Matsuo H, Bax JJ, Douglas PS, Patel MR, Nieman K, Ihdayhid AR.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2022 Aug 01; 16(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 34518113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs 15O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve.
    Williams MC, Mirsadraee S, Dweck MR, Weir NW, Fletcher A, Lucatelli C, MacGillivray T, Golay SK, Cruden NL, Henriksen PA, Uren N, McKillop G, Lima JA, Reid JH, van Beek EJ, Patel D, Newby DE.
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar 01; 27(3):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 27334015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve.
    Koo HJ, Yang DH, Kim YH, Kang JW, Kang SJ, Kweon J, Kim HJ, Lim TH.
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun 01; 32 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 26667445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenosis using CT angiography: diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve computed from coronary CT angiography compared to invasively measured fractional flow reserve.
    Yoon YE, Choi JH, Kim JH, Park KW, Doh JH, Kim YJ, Koo BK, Min JK, Erglis A, Gwon HC, Choe YH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, Oh BH, Park YB.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov 01; 5(11):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23153908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Diagnostic Performance of Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography.
    Kitagawa K, Nakamura S, Ota H, Ogawa R, Shizuka T, Kubo T, Yi Y, Ito T, Nagasawa N, Omori T, Nakamori S, Kurita T, Sugisawa J, Hatori N, Nakashima H, Wang Y, Kido T, Watanabe K, Matsumoto Y, Dohi K, Sakuma H.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2021 Nov 16; 78(20):1937-1949. PubMed ID: 34763770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Quantitative vs. qualitative evaluation of static stress computed tomography perfusion to detect haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
    Pontone G, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Baggiano A, Muscogiuri G, Fusini L, Soldi M, Fazzari F, Berzovini C, Pasquini A, Ciancarella P, Mushtaq S, Conte E, Calligaris G, De Martini S, Ferrari C, Galli S, Grancini L, Ravagnani P, Teruzzi G, Trabattoni D, Fabbiocchi F, Lualdi A, Montorsi P, Rabbat MG, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov 01; 19(11):1244-1252. PubMed ID: 30107557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Single-phase coronary artery CT angiography extracted from stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion on third-generation dual-source CT: Validation by coronary angiography.
    Yi Y, Wu W, Lin L, Zhang HZ, Qian H, Shen ZJ, Wang Y, Jin ZY, Litt H, Wang YN.
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Oct 15; 269():343-349. PubMed ID: 30224034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Stress Myocardial Blood Flow Ratio by Dynamic CT Perfusion Identifies Hemodynamically Significant CAD.
    Yang J, Dou G, He B, Jin Q, Chen Z, Jing J, Di Carli MF, Chen Y, Blankstein R.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Apr 15; 13(4):966-976. PubMed ID: 31542524
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 78.