These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

156 related items for PubMed ID: 31008680

  • 1. Influence of Luting Materials and Methods and the Restoration Surface on the Amount of Cement Remnants in Implant Restorations.
    Lee JH, Yang SE, Lee J, Lee SY.
    J Oral Implantol; 2019 Aug; 45(4):301-307. PubMed ID: 31008680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
    Gehrke P, Bleuel K, Fischer C, Sader R.
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun 14; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW, Duncan J, Afshar M, Moshaverinia A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr 14; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Abutment margin levels and residual cement occurrence in cement-retained implant restorations: An observational study.
    Kim HJ, Karasan D, Park K, Kwon HB, Han JS, Lee JH.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jan 14; 34(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 36278423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of collar height of definitive restoration and type of luting cement on the amount of residual cement in implant restorations: A clinical study.
    Ayyadanveettil P, Thavakkara V, Koodakkadavath S, Thavakkal A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan 14; 129(1):109-115. PubMed ID: 34116840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The influence of the cementation margin position on the amount of undetected cement. A prospective clinical study.
    Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Maslova N, Puriene A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan 14; 24(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 22487018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns.
    Covey DA, Kent DK, St Germain HA, Koka S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar 14; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 10709044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of an improved cementation technique for implant-supported restorations: a randomized controlled trial.
    Canullo L, Cocchetto R, Marinotti F, Oltra DP, Diago MP, Loi I.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Dec 14; 27(12):1492-1499. PubMed ID: 25846254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A Novel Universal Cementation Technique for Implant-Supported Crowns with Subgingival Margins.
    Bhushan P, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore AR, Daswani SR.
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct 14; 26(7):628-632. PubMed ID: 26861492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparing effectiveness of rubber dam and gingival displacement cord with copy abutment in reducing residual cement in cement-retained implant crowns: A crossover RCT.
    Andrijauskas P, Zukauskas S, Alkimavicius J, Peciuliene V, Linkevicius T.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 May 14; 32(5):549-558. PubMed ID: 33595848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of implant abutment modification on the extrusion of excess cement at the crown-abutment margin for cement-retained implant restorations.
    Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A, Hess T, Zhang H, Chung KH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011 May 14; 26(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 22167429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The influence of the emergence profile on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant reconstructions.
    Sancho-Puchades M, Crameri D, Özcan M, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hämmerle CHF, Thoma DS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Dec 14; 28(12):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 28407306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Dec 14; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The influence of margin location on the amount of undetected cement excess after delivery of cement-retained implant restorations.
    Linkevicius T, Vindasiute E, Puisys A, Peciuliene V.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec 14; 22(12):1379-84. PubMed ID: 21382089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.