These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 31045389

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB.
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt.
    Price HL, Bruer KC, Adkins MC.
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.
    Eisen ML, Ying RC, Chui C, Swaby MA.
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C, Fitzgerald RJ.
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF, Wixted JT.
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A Bayesian analysis on the (dis)utility of iterative-showup procedures: The moderating impact of prior probabilities.
    Smith AM, Lindsay RC, Wells GL.
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):503-16. PubMed ID: 27182619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence.
    Wells GL, Kovera MB, Douglass AB, Brewer N, Meissner CA, Wixted JT.
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):3-36. PubMed ID: 32027160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT, Wells GL.
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does filler database size influence identification accuracy?
    Bergold AN, Heaton P.
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Jun; 42(3):227-243. PubMed ID: 29809026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Administrator blindness affects the recording of eyewitness lineup outcomes.
    Rodriguez DN, Berry MA.
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 31535891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.