These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

236 related items for PubMed ID: 31046298

  • 1. The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Jensen KK, Bernstein JGW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2113. PubMed ID: 31046298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V, Molis MR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine-structure distortion on the fluctuating-masker benefit for speech at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Bernstein JG, Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):473-88. PubMed ID: 21786913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B, Zekveld AA, Lunner T, Wendt D, Naylor G, Wang Y, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.
    Bernstein JG, Summers V, Iyer N, Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2676-89. PubMed ID: 23039460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW, Walden TC.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V, Makashay MJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG, Summers V, Grassi E, Grant KW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
    Smits C, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.
    Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD, Perez ZD, D'Aquila LA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4452. PubMed ID: 28679277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: sensation level and decision weights.
    Alexander JM, Lutfi RA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2234-47. PubMed ID: 15532655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Lőcsei G, Pedersen JH, Laugesen S, Santurette S, Dau T, MacDonald EN.
    Trends Hear; 2016 Sep 05; 20():. PubMed ID: 27601071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Subjective ratings of masker disturbance during the perception of native and non-native speech.
    Kilman L, Zekveld AA, Hällgren M, Rönnberg J.
    Front Psychol; 2015 Sep 05; 6():1065. PubMed ID: 26321967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep 05; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM, Plomp R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct 05; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct 05; 120(4):2295-311. PubMed ID: 17069325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep 05; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Suprathreshold Differences in Competing Speech Perception in Older Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing.
    Venezia JH, Leek MR, Lindeman MP.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Jul 20; 63(7):2141-2161. PubMed ID: 32603618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.