These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
197 related items for PubMed ID: 31079314
1. Evaluation of rapid polymerase chain reaction-based organism identification of gram-positive cocci for patients with a single positive blood culture. MacVane SH, Raux BR, Smith TT. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2019 Aug; 38(8):1471-1479. PubMed ID: 31079314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction blood culture identification technology on outcomes in patients with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcal bacteremia. MacVane SH, Hurst JM, Boger MS, Gnann JW. Infect Dis (Lond); 2016 Oct; 48(10):732-7. PubMed ID: 27196015 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Impact of Integrating Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel to an Established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in the United Arab of Emirates. Nasef R, El Lababidi R, Alatoom A, Krishnaprasad S, Bonilla F. Int J Infect Dis; 2020 Feb; 91():124-128. PubMed ID: 31786245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits of Adding a Rapid PCR-Based Blood Culture Identification Panel to an Established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program. MacVane SH, Nolte FS. J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 54(10):2455-63. PubMed ID: 27487951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Chiasson JM, Smith WJ, Jodlowski TZ, Kouma MA, Cutrell JB. J Pharm Pract; 2022 Oct; 35(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 33813935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining the clinical impact of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections in a national cohort of the Veterans Health Administration. Britt NS, Khader K, He T, Willson TM, Effiong A, Timbrook TT, Potter EM, Lodise TP. Pharmacotherapy; 2023 Jan; 43(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 36484553 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of Rapid Diagnostic Testing without Active Stewardship Team Notification for Gram-Positive Blood Cultures in a Community Teaching Hospital. Bukowski PM, Jacoby JS, Jameson AP, Dumkow LE. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2018 Nov; 62(11):. PubMed ID: 30150472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of rapid genotype assay for the identification of gram-positive cocci from blood cultures and detection of mecA and van genes]. Gülhan B, Atmaca S, Ozekinci T, Suay A. Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Oct; 45(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 22090289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Rapid-Blood-Culture-Identification Result Interpretation and Antibiotic Prescribing Practices. Donner LM, Campbell WS, Lyden E, Van Schooneveld TC. J Clin Microbiol; 2017 May; 55(5):1496-1507. PubMed ID: 28250000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel. Carroll KC, Reid JL, Thornberg A, Whitfield NN, Trainor D, Lewis S, Wakefield T, Davis TE, Church KG, Samuel L, Mills R, Jim P, Young S, Nolte FS. J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Mar 25; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 31996444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Impact of the Expanded BioFire Blood Culture Identification 2 Panel in a U.S. Children's Hospital. Graff KE, Palmer C, Anarestani T, Velasquez D, Hamilton S, Pretty K, Parker S, Dominguez SR. Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep 03; 9(1):e0042921. PubMed ID: 34431685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]