These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation. Ivanov A, Faizan A, Sairyo K, Ebraheim N, Biyani A, Goel VK. Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Feb; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17546538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis. Chen CS, Huang CH, Shih SL. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr 09; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical study of dynamic changes in L4-L5 foramen surface area in flexion and extension after implantation of four interspinous process devices. Hirsch C, Breque C, Ragot S, Pascal-Mousselard H, Richer JP, Scepi M, Khiami F. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Apr 09; 101(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 25736197 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy. Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Gaitanis IN, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG. Spine J; 2006 Apr 09; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study. Erbulut DU, Zafarparandeh I, Hassan CR, Lazoglu I, Ozer AF. J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug 09; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure. Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Kang KT, Lee HM, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS. Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jan 09; 56(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 25510758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. Shih SL, Chen CS, Lin HM, Huang LY, Liu CL, Huang CH, Cheng CK. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul 09; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of effects of the Dynesys and Coflex dynamic stabilization systems on range of motion and loading characteristics in the lumbar spine: a finite element study. Kulduk A, Altun NS, Senkoylu A. Int J Med Robot; 2015 Dec 09; 11(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 25643936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interlaminar stabilization offers greater biomechanical advantage compared to interspinous stabilization after lumbar decompression: a finite element analysis. Lu T, Lu Y. J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jul 29; 15(1):291. PubMed ID: 32727615 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of different interspinous process devices in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a finite element analysis. Liu Z, Zhang S, Li J, Tang H. BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jun 17; 23(1):585. PubMed ID: 35715775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar interspinous device with optimized topology. Chen CS, Shih SL. Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Aug 17; 56(8):1333-1341. PubMed ID: 29307048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]