These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 31157720

  • 1. Standardization of the Punch Technique for the Implantation of Bone Anchored Auditory Devices: Evaluation of the MIPS Surgical Set.
    Kim HHS, Kari E, Copeland BJ, Moore GF, Shaia WT, Cosetti MK, Wazen JJ, Wanna GB, Chang CJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jul; 40(6):e631-e635. PubMed ID: 31157720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Osseointegrated Auditory Implants: A Comparison of Linear versus Punch Techniques.
    Gordon SA, Coelho DH.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Jun; 152(6):1089-93. PubMed ID: 25715352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Experience with Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and Linear Incision Approach for Pediatric and Adult Bone Anchored Hearing Implants.
    Bezdjian A, Smith RA, Gabra N, Yang L, Bianchi M, Daniel SJ.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Apr; 129(4):380-387. PubMed ID: 31771342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.
    Dumon T, Medina M, Sperling NM.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.
    De Stefano S, Mochi P, Murri A, Cuda D.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2021 Oct; 41(5):474-480. PubMed ID: 34734584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Single-Center Experience Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of a Novel-Guided Drill System for Percutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant.
    Shoman NM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep 01; 43(8):e797-e803. PubMed ID: 35877782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A retrospective evaluation of minimally invasive ponto surgery (MIPS) in two pediatric centers.
    French G, Lee KH, Yunker WK.
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Sep 01; 22(5):265-269. PubMed ID: 33784936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Calon TG, van Hoof M, van den Berge H, de Bruijn AJ, van Tongeren J, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Jonhede S, Anteunis LJ, Janssen M, Joore MA, Holmberg M, Johansson ML, Stokroos RJ.
    Trials; 2016 Nov 09; 17(1):540. PubMed ID: 27829464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Long term follow-up demonstrating stability and patient satisfaction of minimally invasive punch technique for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.
    Sardiwalla Y, Jufas N, Morris DP.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Nov 20; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 30458887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?
    Strijbos RM, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov 20; 273(11):3713-3722. PubMed ID: 27086360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery Versus the Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Calon TGA, Johansson ML, de Bruijn AJG, van den Berge H, Wagenaar M, Eichhorn E, Janssen MML, Hof JR, Brunings JW, Joore MA, Jonhede S, van Tongeren J, Holmberg M, Stokroos RJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug 20; 39(7):882-893. PubMed ID: 29995008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Findings from the experience with the punch technique for auditory osseointegrated implants: A retrospective single center comparative study.
    Bonilla A, Magri C, Juan E.
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2017 Aug 20; 68(6):309-316. PubMed ID: 28549683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Implantation of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus the Epidermal Flap Technique.
    Dumon T, Wegner I, Sperling N, Grolman W.
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan 20; 38(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 27779562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: our experience with linear incision and punch techniques.
    DI Giustino F, Vannucchi P, Pecci R, Mengucci A, Santimone R, Giannoni B.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2018 Jun 20; 38(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 29984803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Inter-rater Reliability and Validity of Holgers Scores for the Assessment of Bone-anchored Hearing Implant Images.
    Mulvihill D, Kumar R, Muzaffar J, Currier G, Atkin M, Esson R, Limbrick J, Gaskell P, Banga R, Monksfield P.
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb 20; 40(2):200-203. PubMed ID: 30624403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Long-Term Results of the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Reduction Versus Tissue Preservation for Inserting Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: The Ongoing Optimization in Bone Implant Surgery.
    Lindeboom JJ, Labbé N, Strijbos RM, van den Elsen-Hutten M, van Huffelen W, Teunissen EM, Hol MKS, Bom SJH.
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar 01; 45(3):285-294. PubMed ID: 38361296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Direct cost comparison of minimally invasive punch technique versus traditional approaches for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.
    Sardiwalla Y, Jufas N, Morris DP.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Jun 12; 46(1):46. PubMed ID: 28606168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.