These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


178 related items for PubMed ID: 31163373

  • 1. Effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with robot-assisted training on wrist muscle activation post-stroke.
    Miller KJ, Gallina A, Neva JL, Ivanova TD, Snow NJ, Ledwell NM, Xiao ZG, Menon C, Boyd LA, Garland SJ.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 130(8):1271-1279. PubMed ID: 31163373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evidence of neuroplasticity with robotic hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial.
    Singh N, Saini M, Kumar N, Srivastava MVP, Mehndiratta A.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May 06; 18(1):76. PubMed ID: 33957937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Myoelectrically controlled wrist robot for stroke rehabilitation.
    Song R, Tong KY, Hu X, Zhou W.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2013 Jun 10; 10():52. PubMed ID: 23758925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM, Edwards DJ, Ruffini G, Labar D, Stampas A, Pascual-Leone A, Cortes M.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr 10; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on lower extremity spasticity and motor function in stroke patients.
    Rastgoo M, Naghdi S, Nakhostin Ansari N, Olyaei G, Jalaei S, Forogh B, Najari H.
    Disabil Rehabil; 2016 Sep 10; 38(19):1918-26. PubMed ID: 26878554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effects of electromechanical wrist robot assistive system with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation.
    Hu XL, Tong KY, Li R, Xue JJ, Ho SK, Chen P.
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2012 Jun 10; 22(3):431-9. PubMed ID: 22277205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Five-day course of paired associative stimulation fails to improve motor function in stroke patients.
    Tarri M, Brihmat N, Gasq D, Lepage B, Loubinoux I, De Boissezon X, Marque P, Castel-Lacanal E.
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2018 Mar 10; 61(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 29274471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in early stroke patients: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial with clinical, neurophysiological and functional imaging assessments.
    Du J, Yang F, Hu J, Hu J, Xu Q, Cong N, Zhang Q, Liu L, Mantini D, Zhang Z, Lu G, Liu X.
    Neuroimage Clin; 2019 Mar 10; 21():101620. PubMed ID: 30527907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in patients following acute cerebral infarction.
    Chen Q, Shen D, Sun H, Ke J, Wang H, Pan S, Liu H, Wang D, Su M, Fang Q.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2021 Mar 10; 48(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 33361618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical improvement with intensive robot-assisted arm training in chronic stroke is unchanged by supplementary tDCS.
    Edwards DJ, Cortes M, Rykman-Peltz A, Chang J, Elder J, Thickbroom G, Mariman JJ, Gerber LM, Oromendia C, Krebs HI, Fregni F, Volpe BT, Pascual-Leone A.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2019 Mar 10; 37(2):167-180. PubMed ID: 30932903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Low-frequency rTMS in patients with subacute ischemic stroke: clinical evaluation of short and long-term outcomes and neurophysiological assessment of cortical excitability.
    Blesneag AV, Slăvoacă DF, Popa L, Stan AD, Jemna N, Isai Moldovan F, Mureșanu DF.
    J Med Life; 2015 Mar 10; 8(3):378-87. PubMed ID: 26351545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. 5 Hz Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Maximum Voluntary Muscle Contraction Facilitates Cerebral Cortex Excitability of Normal Subjects.
    Yin Z, Shen Y, Reinhardt JD, Chen CF, Jiang X, Dai W, Zhang W, Machado S, Arias-Carrion O, Yuan TF, Shan C.
    CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets; 2015 Mar 10; 14(10):1298-303. PubMed ID: 26556078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke.
    Edwards DJ, Krebs HI, Rykman A, Zipse J, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL, Pascual-Leone A, Volpe BT.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2009 Mar 10; 27(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 19531875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A short bout of high-intensity exercise alters ipsilesional motor cortical excitability post-stroke.
    Li X, Charalambous CC, Reisman DS, Morton SM.
    Top Stroke Rehabil; 2019 Sep 10; 26(6):405-411. PubMed ID: 31144609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effects of combined repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on motor function in patients with stroke.
    Kwon TG, Park E, Kang C, Chang WH, Kim YH.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016 Nov 22; 34(6):915-923. PubMed ID: 27689549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quantitative evaluation of motor functional recovery process in chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted wrist training.
    Hu XL, Tong KY, Song R, Zheng XJ, Lui KH, Leung WW, Ng S, Au-Yeung SS.
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Aug 22; 19(4):639-50. PubMed ID: 18490177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery and motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.
    Du J, Tian L, Liu W, Hu J, Xu G, Ma M, Fan X, Ye R, Jiang Y, Yin Q, Zhu W, Xiong Y, Yang F, Liu X.
    Eur J Neurol; 2016 Nov 22; 23(11):1666-1672. PubMed ID: 27425785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Repeated sessions of functional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases motor cortex excitability and motor control in survivors of stroke.
    Massie CL, Tracy BL, Paxton RJ, Malcolm MP.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013 Nov 22; 33(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23949057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative study of ipsilesional and contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations for acute infarction.
    Watanabe K, Kudo Y, Sugawara E, Nakamizo T, Amari K, Takahashi K, Tanaka O, Endo M, Hayakawa Y, Johkura K.
    J Neurol Sci; 2018 Jan 15; 384():10-14. PubMed ID: 29249365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects.
    Kim YJ, Ku J, Cho S, Kim HJ, Cho YK, Lim T, Kang YJ.
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Aug 18; 11():124. PubMed ID: 25135003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.