These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

243 related items for PubMed ID: 31182403

  • 1. Prediction of Residual Malignancy After Excisional Biopsy for Breast Cancer With Suspicious Microcalcifications: Comparison of Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Park G, Bae K, Hwang IY, Kim JS, Kwon WJ, Bang M.
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(6):e753-e758. PubMed ID: 31182403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparing Accuracy of Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Residual Calcified Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.
    Um E, Kang JW, Lee S, Kim HJ, Yoon TI, Sohn G, Chung IY, Kim J, Lee JW, Son BH, Ahn SH, Ko BS.
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Oct; 18(5):e1087-e1091. PubMed ID: 29703689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS.
    Kim SY, Kim HY, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Yoon JH.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications?
    Brnic D, Brnic D, Simundic I, Vanjaka Rogosic L, Tadic T.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 25995311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Residual microcalcifications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer: comparison of the accuracies of mammography and MRI in predicting pathological residual tumor.
    An YY, Kim SH, Kang BJ.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov 06; 15(1):198. PubMed ID: 29110671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Utility of breast MRI for evaluation of residual disease following excisional biopsy.
    Wilkinson J, Appleton CM, Margenthaler JA.
    J Surg Res; 2011 Oct 06; 170(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 21550064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. 3-T breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.
    Stehouwer BL, Merckel LG, Verkooijen HM, Peters NH, Mann RM, Duvivier KM, Mali WP, Peeters PH, Veldhuis WB, van den Bosch MA.
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Mar 06; 24(3):603-9. PubMed ID: 24078055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The value of MRI contrast enhancement in biopsy decision of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: a prospective multicenter study.
    Taskin F, Kalayci CB, Tuncbilek N, Soydemir E, Kurt N, Kaya H, Aribal E.
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Mar 06; 31(3):1718-1726. PubMed ID: 32939619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.