These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
397 related items for PubMed ID: 31184426
1. Latanoprost treatment differentially affects intraocular pressure readings obtained with three different tonometers. Sánchez-Barahona C, Bolívar G, Katsanos A, Teus MA. Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 97(8):e1112-e1115. PubMed ID: 31184426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Reznicek L, Muth D, Kampik A, Neubauer AS, Hirneiss C. Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Pourjavan S. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of prostaglandin analogues on the biomechanical corneal properties in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension measured with dynamic scheimpflug analyzer. Martínez-Sánchez MI, Bolívar G, Sideroudi H, Teus MA. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 260(12):3927-3933. PubMed ID: 35841397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls. Vinciguerra R, Rehman S, Vallabh NA, Batterbury M, Czanner G, Choudhary A, Cheeseman R, Elsheikh A, Willoughby CE. Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A. Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. Vandewalle E, Vandenbroeck S, Stalmans I, Zeyen T. Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 19(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19787598 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Goldmann and ORA tonometers in newly diagnosed, untreated, POAG and OHT eyes. Sánchez-Barahona C, Bolívar G, Teus MA. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed); 2023 Sep; 98(9):528-532. PubMed ID: 37595792 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension. Ye Y, Yang Y, Fan Y, Lan M, Yu K, Yu M. J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters. Bao F, Huang Z, Huang J, Wang J, Deng M, Li L, Yu A, Wang Q, Elsheikh A. J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes. Tian L, Wang D, Wu Y, Meng X, Chen B, Ge M, Huang Y. Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients. Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Felletti M, Grasso L, Brusini P. J Glaucoma; 2015 Aug; 24(8):568-74. PubMed ID: 25318572 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK. Bao F, Huang W, Zhu R, Lu N, Wang Y, Li H, Wu S, Lin H, Wang J, Zheng X, Huang J, Li Y, Wang Q, Elsheikh A. Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry. Luebke J, Bryniok L, Neuburger M, Jordan JF, Boehringer D, Reinhard T, Wecker T, Anton A. Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2517-2521. PubMed ID: 30968328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Nessim M, Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Laiquzzaman M, Sivakumar S, Hartley S, Shah S. Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Long-Term Topical Prostaglandin Therapy. Wu N, Chen Y, Yu X, Li M, Wen W, Sun X. PLoS One; 2016 Apr; 11(5):e0155527. PubMed ID: 27187282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST. Tejwani S, Dinakaran S, Joshi A, Shetty R, Sinha Roy A. Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer. Brown L, Foulsham W, Pronin S, Tatham AJ. J Glaucoma; 2018 Jun; 27(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 29557828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]