These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Influence of chamber type integrated with computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system on the results of boar semen evaluation. Gączarzewicz D. Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 26812825 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer. Peng N, Zou X, Li L. Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis. Hoogewijs MK, de Vliegher SP, Govaere JL, de Schauwer C, de Kruif A, van Soom A. Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of commercially available chamber slides for computer-aided analysis of human sperm. Dardmeh F, Heidari M, Alipour H. Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Apr; 67(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33375858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of chamber characteristics, loading and analysis time on motility and kinetic variables analysed with the CASA-mot system in goat sperm. Del Gallego R, Sadeghi S, Blasco E, Soler C, Yániz JL, Silvestre MA. Anim Reprod Sci; 2017 Feb; 177():97-104. PubMed ID: 28063626 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of testicular variables, semen motility and kinematics-derived indexes in boar using a CASA-Mot system. Madrigal-Valverde M, Bittencourt RF, Brito LS, Lents MP, Santos ES, Valverde-Abarca A. Reprod Domest Anim; 2020 Mar; 55(3):309-317. PubMed ID: 31899824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a portable device for assessment of motility in stallion semen. Buss T, Aurich J, Aurich C. Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Mar; 54(3):514-519. PubMed ID: 30592335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility. Broekhuijse ML, Šoštarić E, Feitsma H, Gadella BM. J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):779-89. PubMed ID: 22064743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Which fields under a coverslip should one assess to estimate sperm motility? Nöthling JO, dos Santos IP. Theriogenology; 2012 May; 77(8):1686-97. PubMed ID: 22341712 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer. Lenz RW, Kjelland ME, Vonderhaar K, Swannack TM, Moreno JF. J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system]. Cai J, Zeng Y, Song C, Mo ML, Yin B, Lin Q, Huang J. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Contri A, Valorz C, Faustini M, Wegher L, Carluccio A. Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):424-35. PubMed ID: 20451996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments. Amann RP, Waberski D. Theriogenology; 2014 Jan 01; 81(1):5-17.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24274405 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of counting chamber depth on the accuracy of lensless microscopy for the assessment of boar sperm motility. Soler C, Picazo-Bueno JÁ, Micó V, Valverde A, Bompart D, Blasco FJ, Álvarez JG, García-Molina A. Reprod Fertil Dev; 2018 Jun 01; 30(6):924-934. PubMed ID: 29724324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of frame rate capture frequency on sperm kinematic parameters and subpopulation structure definition in boars, analysed with a CASA-Mot system. Valverde A, Madrigal M, Caldeira C, Bompart D, de Murga JN, Arnau S, Soler C. Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Feb 01; 54(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 30171651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]