These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 31256328

  • 1. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing cephalad migration in robotic gynecologic surgery using egg-crate foam versus the Pink Pad®.
    Steck-Bayat KP, Henderson S, Aguirre AG, Smith RB, Mahnert NM, Gerkin RD, Mourad J.
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):343-347. PubMed ID: 31256328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures.
    Klauschie J, Wechter ME, Jacob K, Zanagnolo V, Montero R, Magrina J, Kho R.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):504-7. PubMed ID: 20471916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Patient positioning for robot-assisted laparoscopic benign gynecologic surgery: A review.
    Takmaz O, Asoglu MR, Gungor M.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Apr; 223():8-13. PubMed ID: 29428480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Patient Positioning on Intracranial Pressures during Laparoscopy: A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Sahay N, Sharma S, Bhadani UK, Singh A, Sinha C, Sahay A, Ranjan A, Agarwal M.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):147-152. PubMed ID: 28918894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
    Scheib SA, Fader AN.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mäenpää MM, Nieminen K, Tomás EI, Laurila M, Luukkaala TH, Mäenpää JU.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intraoperative peripheral nerve injury related to lithotomy positioning with steep Trendelenburg in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery - A systematic review.
    Bjøro B, Mykkeltveit I, Rustøen T, Candas Altinbas B, Røise O, Bentsen SB.
    J Adv Nurs; 2020 Feb; 76(2):490-503. PubMed ID: 31736124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery and Perioperative Morbidity in Elderly Women.
    Krause AK, Muntz HG, McGonigle KF.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 27287246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.