These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Dietary sugars and non-caloric sweeteners elicit different homeostatic and hedonic responses in the brain. van Opstal AM, Kaal I, van den Berg-Huysmans AA, Hoeksma M, Blonk C, Pijl H, Rombouts SARB, van der Grond J. Nutrition; 2019 Apr; 60():80-86. PubMed ID: 30529886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal sweetness and side tastes profiles of 16 sweeteners using temporal check-all-that-apply (TCATA). Tan VWK, Wee MSM, Tomic O, Forde CG. Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():39-47. PubMed ID: 31108762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural responses to oral administration of erythritol vs. sucrose and sucralose explain differences in subjective liking ratings. Budzinska A, Teysseire F, Flad E, Dupont P, Wölnerhanssen B, Meyer-Gerspach AC, Van Oudenhove L, Weltens N. Appetite; 2024 Sep 01; 200():107422. PubMed ID: 38788930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners. Wee M, Tan V, Forde C. Nutrients; 2018 Nov 02; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30400167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Impact of Caloric and Non-Caloric Sweeteners on Food Intake and Brain Responses to Food: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Trial in Healthy Humans. Crézé C, Candal L, Cros J, Knebel JF, Seyssel K, Stefanoni N, Schneiter P, Murray MM, Tappy L, Toepel U. Nutrients; 2018 May 15; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 29762471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How Does Our Brain Process Sugars and Non-Nutritive Sweeteners Differently: A Systematic Review on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies. Yeung AWK, Wong NSM. Nutrients; 2020 Sep 30; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 33007961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of artificial and natural sweeteners in reducing the consumption of table sugar: A narrative review. Mooradian AD, Smith M, Tokuda M. Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2017 Apr 30; 18():1-8. PubMed ID: 29132732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of table sugar and non-caloric sweeteners in Brazil: associated factors and changes across a decade. Alves IA, Monteiro LS, Araújo MC, Souza AM, Hassan BK, Rodrigues PRM, Yokoo EM, Sichieri R, Pereira RA. Br J Nutr; 2024 May 14; 131(9):1591-1599. PubMed ID: 38174420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential fructose and glucose appetition in DBA/2, 129P3 and C57BL/6 × 129P3 hybrid mice revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests. Nashed M, Castillo A, Roland M, Carata I, Berglas E, Pines R, Riaz S, Morisset BJ, Sclafani A, Bodnar RJ. Physiol Behav; 2021 Nov 01; 241():113590. PubMed ID: 34509472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice. Sclafani A, Ackroff K. Physiol Behav; 2017 May 01; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Position of the American Dietetic Association: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners. American Dietetic Association. J Am Diet Assoc; 2004 Feb 01; 104(2):255-75. PubMed ID: 14760578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sucrose activates human taste pathways differently from artificial sweetener. Frank GK, Oberndorfer TA, Simmons AN, Paulus MP, Fudge JL, Yang TT, Kaye WH. Neuroimage; 2008 Feb 15; 39(4):1559-69. PubMed ID: 18096409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]