These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Challenges encountered in the conduct of Optimal Health: A patient-centered comparative effectiveness study of interventions for adults with serious mental illness. Kogan JN, Schuster J, Nikolajski C, Schake P, Carney T, Morton SC, Kang C, Reynolds CF. Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 27681658 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A Multilevel Approach to Stakeholder Engagement in the Formulation of a Clinical Data Research Network. Boyer AP, Fair AM, Joosten YA, Dolor RJ, Williams NA, Sherden L, Stallings S, Smoot DT, Wilkins CH. Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S22-S26. PubMed ID: 30074947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Patient-centered Research Agenda: Lessons Learned From the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet). Haynes SC, Rudov L, Nauman E, Hendryx L, Angove RSM, Carton T. Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S27-S32. PubMed ID: 30074948 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Building Meaningful Patient Engagement in Research: Case Study From ADVANCE Clinical Data Research Network. Warren NT, Gaudino JA, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Dickerson K, Robbins L, Norman K, Lind J, D'Amato S, Foley P, Gold R, Bauer V, Fields SA, Cohen DJ, Clark KD, DeVoe JE. Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S58-S63. PubMed ID: 30074953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A Novel Stakeholder Engagement Approach for Patient-centered Outcomes Research. Kim KK, Khodyakov D, Marie K, Taras H, Meeker D, Campos HO, Ohno-Machado L. Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S41-S47. PubMed ID: 30074950 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care. Schmittdiel JA, Desai J, Schroeder EB, Paolino AR, Nichols GA, Lawrence JM, O'Connor PJ, Ohnsorg KA, Newton KM, Steiner JF. Healthc (Amst); 2015 Jun; 3(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 26179728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient vs. Community Engagement: Emerging Issues. Kimminau KS, Jernigan C, LeMaster J, Aaronson LS, Christopher M, Ahmed S, Boivin A, DeFino M, Greenlee R, Salvalaggio G, Hendricks D, Herbert C, Mabachi NM, Macaulay A, Westfall JM, Waitman LR. Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S53-S57. PubMed ID: 30074952 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, Patel K, Wong JB, Leslie LK, Lau J. J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 29(12):1692-701. PubMed ID: 24893581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: challenges, facilitators and actions to strengthen the field. Ellis LE, Kass NE. J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jun; 6(4):363-373. PubMed ID: 28621558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Engaging stakeholders in pharmacoepidemiology research: Current state and recommendations. Camelo Castillo W, Heath N, Kim J, Yang K, Ritchey ME, dosReis S, Santanello N, West SL. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Jun; 28(6):766-776. PubMed ID: 31050092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network. Devine EB, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Devlin A, Edwards TC, Farrokhi ET, Kessler L, Lavallee DC, Patrick DL, Sullivan SD, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Yanez ND, Flum DR, CERTAIN Collaborative. J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S122-9. PubMed ID: 23849146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Engaging patients and consumers in research evidence: Applying the conceptual model of patient and family engagement. Carman KL, Workman TA. Patient Educ Couns; 2017 Jan; 100(1):25-29. PubMed ID: 27473639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Model for a patient-centered comparative effectiveness research center. Costlow MR, Landsittel DP, James AE, Kahn JM, Morton SC. Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Apr; 8(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 25588873 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stakeholder Engagement in a Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measure Implementation: A Report from the SAFTINet Practice-based Research Network (PBRN). Kwan BM, Sills MR, Graham D, Hamer MK, Fairclough DL, Hammermeister KE, Kaiser A, de Jesus Diaz-Perez M, Schilling LM. J Am Board Fam Med; 2016 Apr; 29(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 26769882 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuous patient engagement in cardiovascular disease clinical comparative effectiveness research. Vandigo J, Oloyede E, Aly A, Laird AL, Cooke CE, Mullins CD. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 Apr; 16(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 26950206 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Young adult and parent stakeholder perspectives on participation in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. Saunders T, Mackie TI, Shah S, Gooding H, de Ferranti SD, Leslie LK. J Comp Eff Res; 2016 Aug; 5(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 27427160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Multistakeholder Engagement in PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. Selby JV, Grossman C, Zirkle M, Barbash S. Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S4-S5. PubMed ID: 30074942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. IMPACCT Kids' Care: a real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research. Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Angier H, Sumic A, Harding RL, Cottrell EK, Cohen DJ, Nelson CA, Burdick TE, Wallace LS, Gallia C, DeVoe JE. J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Aug; 4(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 26274796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Engagement in PCORnet Research Networks. Kim KK, Helfand M. Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S1-S3. PubMed ID: 30074945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]