These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 31300913

  • 1. Experiences and psychological outcomes of the oocyte donor: a survey of donors post-donation from one center.
    Blakemore JK, Voigt P, Schiffman MR, Lee S, Besser AG, Fino ME.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Oct; 36(10):1999-2005. PubMed ID: 31300913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Attitudes of anonymous and identity-release oocyte donors towards future contact with donor offspring.
    Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Suikkari AM, Söderström-Anttila V.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr 01; 34(4):672-678. PubMed ID: 30805634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun 01; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.
    Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjö G.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep 01; 29(9):1978-86. PubMed ID: 25030191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donors.
    Söderström-Anttila V, Miettinen A, Rotkirch A, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Poranen AK, Sälevaara M, Suikkari AM.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar 01; 31(3):597-606. PubMed ID: 26724795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preferences and needs regarding future contact with donation offspring among identity-release gamete donors: results from the Swedish Study on Gamete Donation.
    Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct 01; 102(4):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25123638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.
    Isaksson S, Sydsjö G, Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C.
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Oct 01; 27(10):2998-3007. PubMed ID: 22859508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donation.
    Laruelle C, Place I, Demeestere I, Englert Y, Delbaere A.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb 01; 26(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 21149319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Views of donors and recipients regarding disclosure to children following altruistic known oocyte donation.
    Yee S, Blyth E, Tsang AK.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec 01; 23(7):851-9. PubMed ID: 22019613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Similarities and differences between anonymous and directed candidates for oocyte donation.
    Greenfeld DA, Mazure CM, Olive DL, Keefe DL.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Feb 01; 12(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 7670269
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Views of French oocyte donors at least 3 years after donation.
    Cordier C, Ducrocq B, Fry J, Catteau-Jonard S.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Jun 01; 40(6):819-826. PubMed ID: 32295744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors' experiences.
    Jordan CB, Belar CD, Williams RS.
    J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Jun 01; 25(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 15715037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.
    Baetens P, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem AC, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I.
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Feb 01; 15(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 10655327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A follow-up study with oocyte donors exploring their experiences, knowledge, and attitudes about the use of their oocytes and the outcome of the donation.
    Kalfoglou AL, Geller G.
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Oct 01; 74(4):660-7. PubMed ID: 11020503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Psychological adjustment in disclosing and non-disclosing heterosexual-couple families following conception with oocytes or spermatozoa from identity-release donors.
    Widbom A, Sydsjö G, Lampic C.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov 01; 45(5):1046-1053. PubMed ID: 35953415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Quality of information for oocyte donors on South African donor agency websites: a content analysis.
    Hammarberg K, Yang FH, Volks C, Whittaker A.
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2024 Dec 01; 27(1):2413531. PubMed ID: 39402915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Exploring motivations, attitudes and experiences of oocyte donors: A qualitative study.
    Borgstrøm MB, Nygaard SS, Danielsen AK, Kesmodel US.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug 01; 98(8):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 30779111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Oocyte donors' experience and expectations in a non-profit fertility care setting.
    Li Piani L, Tshilembi A, De Vos M, Buyse E, Ruttens S, Somigliana E, Tournaye H, Blockeel C.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Sep 01; 41(9):2337-2347. PubMed ID: 39042340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Rethinking gamete donor care: A satisfaction survey of egg and sperm donors in the UK.
    Williams RA, Machin LL.
    PLoS One; 2018 Sep 01; 13(7):e0199971. PubMed ID: 30036373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. "They were my eggs; they were her babies": known oocyte donors' conceptualizations of their reproductive material.
    Blyth E, Yee S, Tsang AK.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Nov 01; 33(11):1134-40. PubMed ID: 22082787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.