These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

143 related items for PubMed ID: 31300913

  • 21. Survey report of gamete donors' and recipients' preferences regarding disclosure of third party reproduction outcomes and genetic risk information.
    Lindheim SR, Porat N, Jaeger AS.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Apr; 37(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 21349122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Young Women’s Attitudes Towards Modern Reproductive Practices: A Survey Study Assessing What Young Women Want.
    Druckenmiller S, DeVore S, Knopman JM, Noyes N.
    J Reprod Med; 2017 Apr; 62(3-4):111-18. PubMed ID: 30230301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons.
    Yee S, Hitkari JA, Greenblatt EM.
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jul; 22(7):2040-50. PubMed ID: 17507386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Oocyte donors' comprehension as assessed by the EDICT (Egg Donor Informed Consent Tool).
    Skillern AA, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):248-51. PubMed ID: 24140037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Expectations and experiences of gamete donors and donor-conceived adults searching for genetic relatives using DNA linking through a voluntary register.
    van den Akker OB, Crawshaw MA, Blyth ED, Frith LJ.
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 25358347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Pregnancy following anonymous oocyte donation: Experience and feelings].
    Guillou J, Séjourné N, Chabrol H.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 May; 37(5):410-4. PubMed ID: 19395302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. "I want us to be a normal family": Toward an understanding of the functions of anonymity among U.S. oocyte donors and recipients.
    de Melo-Martín I, Rubin LR, Cholst IN.
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018 May; 9(4):235-251. PubMed ID: 30398412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Same-sex mothers' experiences of equal treatment, parenting stress and disclosure to offspring: a population-based study of parenthood following identity-release sperm donation.
    Thorup E, Sydsjö G, Lampic C.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct 31; 37(11):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 36099155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Psychological aspects in anonymous and non-anonymous oocyte donation.
    Weil E, Cornet D, Sibony C, Mandelbaum J, Salat-Baroux J.
    Hum Reprod; 1994 Jul 31; 9(7):1344-7. PubMed ID: 7962446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A survey of parental attitudes toward oocyte donation.
    Pettee D, Weckstein LN.
    Hum Reprod; 1993 Nov 31; 8(11):1963-5. PubMed ID: 8288766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Egg donation for stem cell research: ideas of surplus and deficit in Australian IVF patients' and reproductive donors' accounts.
    Waldby C, Carroll K.
    Sociol Health Illn; 2012 May 31; 34(4):513-28. PubMed ID: 21951180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Disclosure decisions among known and anonymous oocyte donation recipients.
    Greenfeld DA, Klock SC.
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun 31; 81(6):1565-71. PubMed ID: 15193478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Once you're choosing, nobody's perfect: is more information necessarily better in oocyte donor selection?
    Rubin LR, de Melo-Martin I, Rosenwaks Z, Cholst IN.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Mar 31; 30(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25596906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Stakeholders views on the ethical aspects of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a qualitative interview study with donors, recipients and professionals.
    Kool EM, van der Graaf R, Bos AME, Pieters JJPM, Custers IM, Fauser BCJM, Bredenoord AL.
    Hum Reprod; 2019 May 01; 34(5):842-850. PubMed ID: 30927419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Using the theory of planned behavior to predict parents' disclosure of donor conception to their children: a longitudinal study.
    Paulin J, Sorjonen K, Sydsjö G, Lampic C.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jun 03; 39(6):1247-1255. PubMed ID: 38593421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Online sperm donation: a survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website.
    Freeman T, Jadva V, Tranfield E, Golombok S.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep 03; 31(9):2082-9. PubMed ID: 27412344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. What importance do donors and recipients attribute to the nuclear DNA-related genetic heritage of oocyte donation?
    Mayeur A, Magnan F, Mathieu S, Rubens P, Sperelakis Beedham B, Sonigo C, Steffann J, Frydman N.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Apr 03; 39(4):770-778. PubMed ID: 38420661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Long-term follow-up of mental health and satisfaction in a Swedish sample of sperm and egg donors after open-identity donation.
    Sydsjö G, Lampic C, Bladh M, Nedstrand E, Svanberg AS.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Dec 03; 47(6):103417. PubMed ID: 37931369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Egg sharing and egg donation: attitudes of British egg donors and recipients.
    Ahuja KK, Mostyn BJ, Simons EG.
    Hum Reprod; 1997 Dec 03; 12(12):2845-52. PubMed ID: 9455866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.