These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

450 related items for PubMed ID: 31310616

  • 1. Speech-specific audiovisual integration modulates induced theta-band oscillations.
    Lindborg A, Baart M, Stekelenburg JJ, Vroomen J, Andersen TS.
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219744. PubMed ID: 31310616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Early and late beta-band power reflect audiovisual perception in the McGurk illusion.
    Roa Romero Y, Senkowski D, Keil J.
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr 01; 113(7):2342-50. PubMed ID: 25568160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ, Backer KC, Rosenblum LD, Kerlin JR.
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb 14; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Theta oscillations reflect conflict processing in the perception of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L, Torralba M, Soto-Faraco S.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 Oct 14; 48(7):2630-2641. PubMed ID: 29250857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study.
    Kaganovich N, Schumaker J, Macias D, Gustafson D.
    Dev Sci; 2015 Sep 14; 18(5):751-70. PubMed ID: 25440407
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Mismatch negativity evoked by the McGurk-MacDonald effect: a phonetic representation within short-term memory.
    Colin C, Radeau M, Soquet A, Demolin D, Colin F, Deltenre P.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Apr 14; 113(4):495-506. PubMed ID: 11955994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K, MacDonald EN, Andersen TS.
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan 14; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF, Beauchamp MS.
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb 14; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spatio-temporal distribution of brain activity associated with audio-visually congruent and incongruent speech and the McGurk Effect.
    Pratt H, Bleich N, Mittelman N.
    Brain Behav; 2015 Nov 14; 5(11):e00407. PubMed ID: 26664791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Multisensory integration of speech sounds with letters vs. visual speech: only visual speech induces the mismatch negativity.
    Stekelenburg JJ, Keetels M, Vroomen J.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2018 May 14; 47(9):1135-1145. PubMed ID: 29537657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrophysiological evidence for differences between fusion and combination illusions in audiovisual speech perception.
    Baart M, Lindborg A, Andersen TS.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Nov 14; 46(10):2578-2583. PubMed ID: 28976045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
    Abbott NT, Shahin AJ.
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec 01; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A, Berthommier F, Leybaert J.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Dec 01; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Audiovisual speech perception: Moving beyond McGurk.
    Van Engen KJ, Dey A, Sommers MS, Peelle JE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Dec 01; 152(6):3216. PubMed ID: 36586857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. "Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
    Brown VA, Strand JF.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug 01; 81(6):1743-1756. PubMed ID: 31197661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Neural Correlates of Modality-Sensitive Deviance Detection in the Audiovisual Oddball Paradigm.
    Randazzo M, Priefer R, Smith PJ, Nagler A, Avery T, Froud K.
    Brain Sci; 2020 May 28; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 32481538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.