These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

484 related items for PubMed ID: 31313531

  • 1. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration vs core needle biopsy for solid pancreatic lesions: Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and procedural efficiency.
    Syed A, Babich O, Rao B, Singh S, Carleton N, Gulati A, Kulkarni A, Garg M, Farah K, Kochhar G, Morrissey S, Mitre M, Kulkarni A, Dhawan M, Silverman JF, Pharaon M, Thakkar S.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1138-1144. PubMed ID: 31313531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Diagnostic Evaluation of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Versus Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
    Caymaz I, Afandiyeva N.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2023 Nov; 46(11):1596-1602. PubMed ID: 37464106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.
    Sur YK, Kim YC, Kim JK, Lee JH, Yoo BM, Kim YB.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF, Larghi A, Bernardoni L, Parisi A, Frulloni L, Gabbrielli A, Parcesepe P, Scarpa A, Manfrin E.
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Utility of core biopsy with concurrent ROSE FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumor-does the biopsy add any diagnostic benefit?
    Yan L, Ikemura K, Park JW.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Feb; 46(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 29227044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cytology with rapid on-site examination (ROSE) does not improve diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of pancreatic cystic lesions.
    Estrada P, Benson M, Gopal D, Buehler D, Pfau P.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Nov; 47(11):1184-1189. PubMed ID: 31356003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study.
    Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HK, Choi HJ, Choi MH, Kim DC, Lee TH, Cha SW, Cho YD, Park SH.
    Endoscopy; 2014 Dec; 46(12):1056-62. PubMed ID: 25098611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of solid mass lesions of the pancreas: A retrospective comparison study of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy.
    Sweeney J, Soong L, Goyal A.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Apr; 48(4):322-329. PubMed ID: 31903736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. EUS-guided reverse bevel fine-needle biopsy sampling and open tip fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions - a prospective, comparative study.
    Hedenström P, Demir A, Khodakaram K, Nilsson O, Sadik R.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 53(2):231-237. PubMed ID: 29301477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ, Yim H, Hwang JC, Lee D, Kim YB, Lim SG, Kim SS, Kang JK, Yoo BM, Kim JH.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep 29; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial.
    Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Hikichi T, Suzuki R, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Konno N, Waragai Y, Watanabe H, Obara K, Ohira H.
    Pancreatology; 2015 Sep 29; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
    Noh DH, Choi K, Gu S, Cho J, Jang KT, Woo YS, Lee KT, Lee JK, Lee KH.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan 29; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
    Itonaga M, Yasukawa S, Shimokawa T, Takenaka M, Fukutake N, Ogura T, Sakagami J, Shiomi H, Okura Y, Inatomi O, Matsumoto H, Kurita A, Suzuki A, Tanaka K, Kitano M.
    Trials; 2019 Dec 30; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.