These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

221 related items for PubMed ID: 31331705

  • 1. Three-phase treatment concept for skeletal Class III growing patients with severe space deficiency: A report of three cases with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction.
    Lin HY, Yang H, Lai EH, Lin SY, Chang JZ.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Apr; 119(4):869-878. PubMed ID: 31331705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D, Martin C, Weaver B, Gunel E.
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Apr; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Hybrid Hyrax Distalizer, a new all-in-one appliance for rapid palatal expansion, early class III treatment and upper molar distalization.
    Wilmes B, Ludwig B, Katyal V, Nienkemper M, Rein A, Drescher D.
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S47-53. PubMed ID: 25138366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C, Sahinoğlu Z, Özçirpici AA, Uçkan S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.
    Cha BK, Choi DS, Ngan P, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Kim SM, Jang IS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 21195283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı AC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.
    Hino CT, Cevidanes LH, Nguyen TT, De Clerck HJ, Franchi L, McNamara JA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 24182587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dentofacial and skeletal effects of two orthodontic maxillary protraction protocols: bone anchors versus facemask.
    Tabellion M, Lisson JA.
    Head Face Med; 2024 Oct 18; 20(1):60. PubMed ID: 39425193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Liang S, Wang F, Chang Q, Bai Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Sep 18; 160(3):374-384. PubMed ID: 34172344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Nov 18; 126(5):555-68. PubMed ID: 15520688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Class III malocclusion treated with a 3D-printed hybrid hyrax distalizer combined with mentoplate using Alt-RAMEC protocol: A case report.
    Kathem SJ, Matras RC, Abbas SOM.
    J Orthod; 2024 Jun 18; 51(2):183-191. PubMed ID: 37392009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The efficacy of maxillary protraction protocols with the micro-implant-assisted rapid palatal expander (MARPE) and the novel N2 mini-implant-a finite element study.
    Moon W, Wu KW, MacGinnis M, Sung J, Chu H, Youssef G, Machado A.
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Jun 18; 16():16. PubMed ID: 26061987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletally anchored maxillary protraction protocols.
    Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, Khedr M, Evans CA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov 18; 150(5):751-762. PubMed ID: 27871701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars.
    Hourfar J, Ludwig B, Kanavakis G.
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep 18; 41 Suppl 1():S24-32. PubMed ID: 25138362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances.
    Palma JC, Tejedor-Sanz N, Oteo MD, Alarcón JA.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar 18; 85(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24892796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L, Chen R, Yang Y, Ji G, Shen G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb 18; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.