These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

467 related items for PubMed ID: 31349816

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM, Yeum SC, Kim BW, Kim JS, Kim JH, Sim EH, Ji JS, Choi H.
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul 15; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan 15; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA.
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I, Gradišer M, Nikolić M, Baršić N, Ljubičić N, Kralj D, Budimir I.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov 01; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV, Thulaseedharan NK, Raj R, Unnikrishnan DC, Jacob A.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug 01; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç, Soykan I, Karakaya F, Tüzün A, Gençtürk ZB.
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr 01; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Lu X, Zhang X, Chen H.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun 01; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P.
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 01; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV, Kuo P, Williamson K, Yam C, Schoeman MN, Holloway RH, Nguyen NQ.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct 01; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.
    Martínez-Cara JG, Jiménez-Rosales R, Úbeda-Muñoz M, de Hierro ML, de Teresa J, Redondo-Cerezo E.
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun 01; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparing AIMS65 Score With MEWS, qSOFA Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Lai YC, Hung MS, Chen YH, Chen YC.
    J Acute Med; 2018 Dec 01; 8(4):154-167. PubMed ID: 32995218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Far from an ideal score.
    Aluizio CLS, Montes CG, Reis GFSR, Nagasako CK.
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021 Dec 01; 76():e2921. PubMed ID: 34190855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Espinoza-Ríos J, Aguilar Sánchez V, Bravo Paredes EA, Pinto Valdivia J, Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J.
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016 Dec 01; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.