These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 31360713

  • 1. Clinical Aspects of HyFoSy as Tubal Patency Test in Subfertility Workup.
    Exalto N, Emanuel MH.
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():4827376. PubMed ID: 31360713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J, van Welie N, Dreyer K, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, Kleiman-Broeze KA, Traas MAF, Muijsers GJJM, Manger AP, Gianotten J, de Koning CH, Koning AMH, Bayram N, van der Ham DP, Vrouenraets FPJM, Kalafusova M, van de Laar BIG, Kaijser J, van Oostwaard MF, Meijer WJ, Broekmans FJM, Valkenburg O, van der Voet LF, van Disseldorp J, Lambers MJ, Peters HE, Lier MCI, Lambalk CB, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Stoker J, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Mijatovic V.
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May 09; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Can hysterosalpingo-foam sonography replace hysterosalpingography as first-choice tubal patency test? A randomized non-inferiority trial.
    van Welie N, van Rijswijk J, Dreyer K, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, van Baal WM, Traas MAF, van Peperstraten AM, Manger AP, Gianotten J, de Koning CH, Koning AMH, Bayram N, van der Ham DP, Vrouenraets FPJM, Kalafusova M, van de Laar BIG, Kaijser J, Lambeek AF, Meijer WJ, Broekmans FJM, Valkenburg O, van der Voet LF, van Disseldorp J, Lambers MJ, Tros R, Lambalk CB, Stoker J, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Mol BWJ, Mijatovic V.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 May 03; 37(5):969-979. PubMed ID: 35220432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography versus hysterosalpingography during fertility work-up: an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamphuis D, van Eekelen R, van Welie N, Dreyer K, van Rijswijk J, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, van Baal WM, Traas MAF, van Peperstraten AM, Manger AP, Gianotten J, de Koning CH, Koning AMH, Bayram N, van der Ham DP, Vrouenraets FPJM, Kalafusova M, van de Laar BIG, Kaijser J, Lambeek AF, Meijer WJ, Broekmans FJM, Valkenburg O, van der Voet LF, van Disseldorp J, Lambers MJ, Tros R, Lambalk CB, Stoker J, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Mol BWJ, Mijatovic V.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jun 03; 39(6):1222-1230. PubMed ID: 38600625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
    Ludwin I, Ludwin A, Wiechec M, Nocun A, Banas T, Basta P, Pitynski K.
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr 01; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dreyer K, Out R, Hompes PG, Mijatovic V.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep 01; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B, Lazzeri L, Franchini M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Nappi C, Piccione E, Exacoustos C.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan 01; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of prior hysterosalpingo-foam sonography or hysterosalpingography on tubal patency: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
    Kamphuis D, van Welie N, van Rijswijk J, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, van Baal WM, Lambalk CB, Stoker J, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Mol BWJ, Dreyer K, Mijatovic V, FOAM study group .
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Nov 01; 39(11):2485-2490. PubMed ID: 39190881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluating Fallopian Tube Patency: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.
    Grigovich M, Kacharia VS, Bharwani N, Hemingway A, Mijatovic V, Rodgers SK.
    Radiographics; 2021 Oct 01; 41(6):1876-18961. PubMed ID: 34597232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
    Exacoustos C, Pizzo A, Lazzeri L, Pietropolli A, Piccione E, Zupi E.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Oct 01; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Live birth after additional tubal flushing with oil-based contrast versus no additional flushing: a randomised, multicentre, parallel-group pragmatic trial in infertile women with at least one patent tube at hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HYFOIL study).
    De Neubourg D, Janssens L, Verhaegen I, Smits E, Mol BW, Roelant E.
    BMJ Open; 2021 Nov 29; 11(11):e054845. PubMed ID: 34845077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. First experiences with hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) for office tubal patency testing.
    Emanuel MH, van Vliet M, Weber M, Exalto N.
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jan 29; 27(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22064649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Is hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) more tolerable in terms of pain and anxiety than hysterosalpingography (HSG)? A prospective real-world setting multicentre study.
    Serrano González L, Pérez-Medina T, Bueno Olalla B, Royuela A, De La Cuesta MLR, Saéz de la Mata D, Domínguez-Franjo E, Calles-Sastre L, Engels V.
    BMC Womens Health; 2022 Feb 13; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 35152893
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with saline medium (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency.
    Lim SL, Jung JJ, Yu SL, Rajesh H.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec 13; 195():168-172. PubMed ID: 26547487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hysterosalpingography is obsolete: hysterosalpingo-contrast foam sonography should be the alternative.
    Ramos J, Pellicer N, Fernández-Sánchez M.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2022 Nov 13; 45(5):839-842. PubMed ID: 35842356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Diagnostic Accuracy Study Comparing Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography and Hysterosalpingography for Fallopian Tube Patency Assessment.
    Ramos J, Caligara C, Santamaría-López E, González-Ravina C, Prados N, Carranza F, Blasco V, Fernández-Sánchez M.
    J Clin Med; 2021 Sep 15; 10(18):. PubMed ID: 34575278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency.
    Luciano DE, Exacoustos C, Luciano AA.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014 Sep 15; 21(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 24910933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy): Tolerability, safety and the occurrence of pregnancy post-procedure.
    Tanaka K, Chua J, Cincotta R, Ballard EL, Duncombe G.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Feb 15; 58(1):114-118. PubMed ID: 28949014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Does hysterosalpingo-foam sonography have any therapeutic effect? A systematic review.
    Piccioni MG, Tabacco S, Merlino L, Del Negro V, Mazzeo A, Logoteta A, Del Prete F, Riganelli L, Giannini A, Monti M.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2020 Feb 15; 72(1):55-58. PubMed ID: 32153165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography to confirm tubal occlusion after Essure® placement as treatment for hydrosalpinges.
    Dreyer K, Hompes PG, Mijatovic V.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Apr 15; 30(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 25682307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.