These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

100 related items for PubMed ID: 3136507

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Decision analysis to assess cost-effectiveness of low-osmolality contrast medium for intravenous urography.
    Calvo MV, Pilar del Val M, Mar Alvarez M, Domínguez-Gil A.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992 Mar; 49(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 1598930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of intravascular low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Swanson DP, Thrall JH, Shetty PC.
    Clin Pharm; 1986 Nov; 5(11):877-91. PubMed ID: 3780159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The cost-effectiveness of replacing high-osmolality with low-osmolality contrast media.
    Caro JJ, Trindade E, McGregor M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Oct; 159(4):869-74. PubMed ID: 1529856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Medical and economic considerations in using a new contrast medium.
    Fischer HW, Spataro RF, Rosenberg PM.
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Sep; 146(9):1717-21. PubMed ID: 3092757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Parfrey PS, Barrett BJ.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul 16; 327(3):204-5. PubMed ID: 1608421
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. High-osmolality and low-osmolality contrast agents.
    Paulin S.
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Jul 16; 327(3):202-3; author reply 204-5. PubMed ID: 1608418
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Advantages of a low-osmolality ionic contrast medium in intra-arterial applications.
    Miller K.
    Radiol Technol; 1987 Jul 16; 59(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 3659338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Preston M. Hickey memorial lecture. Ionic and nonionic iodinated contrast media: evolution and strategies for use.
    McClennan BL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Aug 16; 155(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 2115244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Malpractice, informed consent, and the use of low osmolality contrast media.
    Eisner JM, Casey BJ.
    Conn Med; 1988 Feb 16; 52(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 3278846
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Osmolality of contrast media--a risk factor in radiological endovascular procedures in children].
    Mikhel'son BA, Guliev ND, Lazarev VV, Poliaev IuA, Vodolazov IuA.
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1991 Aug 16; (8):85-9. PubMed ID: 1942890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Low-osmolality contrast media in the 1990s: prices change.
    Palmisano SM.
    Radiology; 1997 May 16; 203(2):309; discussion 312-4. PubMed ID: 9114078
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.