These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
233 related items for PubMed ID: 31381442
1. Residual road departure crashes after full deployment of LDW and LDP systems. Riexinger LE, Sherony R, Gabler HC. Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S177-S181. PubMed ID: 31381442 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The safety potential of lane departure warning systems-A descriptive real-world study of fatal lane departure passenger car crashes in Sweden. Sternlund S. Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May 29; 18(sup1):S18-S23. PubMed ID: 28394639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effectiveness of lane departure warning systems-A reduction in real-world passenger car injury crashes. Sternlund S, Strandroth J, Rizzi M, Lie A, Tingvall C. Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Feb 17; 18(2):225-229. PubMed ID: 27624313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence of driver physical factors leading to unintentional lane departure crashes. Cicchino JB, Zuby DS. Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul 04; 18(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 27740863 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effectiveness of centerline rumble strips (CLRS) on two-lane carriageways in Sweden on injury accident risk for cars equipped with electronic stability control (ESC) and cars without ESC. Sternlund S. Traffic Inj Prev; 2019 Jul 04; 20(8):880-885. PubMed ID: 31710510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders. Scanlon JM, Kusano KD, Gabler HC. Traffic Inj Prev; 2015 Jul 04; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Field effectiveness evaluation of advanced driver assistance systems. Spicer R, Vahabaghaie A, Bahouth G, Drees L, Martinez von Bülow R, Baur P. Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul 04; 19(sup2):S91-S95. PubMed ID: 30543454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Crash avoidance potential of four large truck technologies. Jermakian JS. Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Nov 04; 49():338-46. PubMed ID: 22763402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Toyota drivers' experiences with Dynamic Radar Cruise Control, Pre-Collision System, and Lane-Keeping Assist. Eichelberger AH, McCartt AT. J Safety Res; 2016 Feb 04; 56():67-73. PubMed ID: 26875167 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies. Eichelberger AH, McCartt AT. Traffic Inj Prev; 2014 Feb 04; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An insight into the performance of road barriers - redistribution of barrier-relevant crashes. Zou Y, Tarko AP. Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov 04; 96():152-161. PubMed ID: 27529451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-agent traffic simulations to estimate the impact of automated technologies on safety. Kitajima S, Shimono K, Tajima J, Antona-Makoshi J, Uchida N. Traffic Inj Prev; 2019 Nov 04; 20(sup1):S58-S64. PubMed ID: 31381431 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of injury severities in single-vehicle crashes in North Carolina using mixed logit models. Roque C, Jalayer M, Hasan AS. J Safety Res; 2021 Jun 04; 77():161-169. PubMed ID: 34092306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]