These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 31384893

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Single crowns with CAD/CAM-fabricated copings from titanium: 6-year clinical results.
    Hey J, Beuer F, Bensel T, Boeckler AF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 24529840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
    Alhasanyah A, Vaidyanathan TK, Flinton RJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
    Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Borges J, Almeida R.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
    Hosseini M, Kleven E, Gotfredsen K.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A, Lee H, Geminiani A, Ercoli C, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of the porcelain fracture resistance of screw-retained and cement-retained implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns.
    Torrado E, Ercoli C, Al Mardini M, Graser GN, Tallents RH, Cordaro L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 15211294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prospective observation of CAD/CAM titanium ceramic single crowns: a three-year follow up.
    Boeckler AF, Lee H, Stadler A, Setz JM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Nov; 102(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 19853170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
    Aramouni P, Zebouni E, Tashkandi E, Dib S, Salameh Z, Almas K.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov 01; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P, Mutinelli S.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun 01; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.