These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

323 related items for PubMed ID: 31439233

  • 1. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
    Ding K, Yao Y, Gao Y, Lu X, Chen H, Tang Q, Hua C, Zhou M, Zou X, Yin Q.
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Sigmund EE, Johnson G, Babb JS, Mussi TC, Melamed J, Taneja SS, Lee VS, Jensen JH.
    Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22550312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
    Suo S, Chen X, Wu L, Zhang X, Yao Q, Fan Y, Wang H, Xu J.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.
    Barrett T, McLean M, Priest AN, Lawrence EM, Patterson AJ, Koo BC, Patterson I, Warren AY, Doble A, Gnanapragasam VJ, Kastner C, Gallagher FA.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug; 28(8):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 29222677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC, Kuder TA, Kuru TH, Fenchel M, Hadaschik BA, Laun FB, Schlemmer HP, Stieltjes B.
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of mono-exponential, bi-exponential, kurtosis, and fractional-order calculus models of diffusion-weighted imaging in characterizing prostate lesions in transition zone.
    Liu G, Lu Y, Dai Y, Xue K, Yi Y, Xu J, Wu D, Wu G.
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jun; 46(6):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 33388809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the Transition Zone by diffusion-weighted MRI.
    Bao J, Wang X, Hu C, Hou J, Dong F, Guo L.
    Eur J Radiol Open; 2017 Jun; 4():123-128. PubMed ID: 29034282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Triexponential function analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosing prostate cancer.
    Ueda Y, Takahashi S, Ohno N, Kyotani K, Kawamitu H, Miyati T, Aoyama N, Ueno Y, Kitajima K, Kawakami F, Okuaki T, Tsukamoto R, Yanagita E, Sugimura K.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 43(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 26119033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
    Shan Y, Chen X, Liu K, Zeng M, Zhou J.
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
    Wang X, Tu N, Qin T, Xing F, Wang P, Wu G.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Kopec M, Kong X, Melamed J, Dakwar G, Babb JS, Taouli B.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Relationship between T2 relaxation and apparent diffusion coefficient in malignant and non-malignant prostate regions and the effect of peripheral zone fractional volume.
    Simpkin CJ, Morgan VA, Giles SL, Riches SF, Parker C, deSouza NM.
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 86(1024):20120469. PubMed ID: 23426849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. T1 Mapping of the Prostate Using Single-Shot T1FLASH: A Clinical Feasibility Study to Optimize Prostate Cancer Assessment.
    Al-Bourini O, Seif Amir Hosseini A, Giganti F, Balz J, Heitz LG, Voit D, Lotz J, Trojan L, Frahm J, Uhlig A, Uhlig J.
    Invest Radiol; 2023 Jun 01; 58(6):380-387. PubMed ID: 36729865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer].
    Wen R, Zhao WL, Wei CG, Gu YF, Li MJ, Zhang YY, Shen JK.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar 19; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.