These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 3145542

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Some observations on D antigen expression of D-positive and 'weak D-positive' red cells as assessed by flow cytometry.
    Nelson M, Barrow LA, Popp H, Gibson J.
    Vox Sang; 1995; 69(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 8585204
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Studies on the epitopes recognized by monoclonal anti-D, anti-c and anti-E.
    Hughes-Jones NC, Gorick B, McDougall D, Melamed M, Thompson K.
    Rev Fr Transfus Immunohematol; 1988 Apr; 31(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 2463658
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Two examples of an inseparable antibody that reacts equally well with DW+ and Rh32+ red blood cells.
    Reid ME, Sausais L, Zaroulis CG, Mohandas K, Coghlan G, Lomas-Francis C.
    Vox Sang; 1998 Apr; 75(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 9852412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Weak D type 1.1 exemplifies another complexity in weak D genotyping.
    Doescher A, Flegel WA, Petershofen EK, Bauerfeind U, Wagner FF.
    Transfusion; 2005 Oct; 45(10):1568-73. PubMed ID: 16181206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [The gel centrifugation test--principles of the method].
    Hitzler W.
    Beitr Infusionsther; 1990 Oct; 26():370-3. PubMed ID: 1703875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Novel weak D types 31 and 32: adsorption-elution-supported D antigen analysis and comparison to prevalent weak D types.
    Körmöczi GF, Förstemann E, Gabriel C, Mayr WR, Schönitzer D, Gassner C.
    Transfusion; 2005 Oct; 45(10):1574-80. PubMed ID: 16181207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. More on the R0 Har antigenic complex.
    Case J.
    Transfusion; 1996 Oct; 36(11-12):1034-5. PubMed ID: 8937417
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Blood grouping with monoclonal anti-N antibodies.
    Fletcher A, Harbour C, Matthews M, de Zwart R, Ford D.
    Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci; 1986 Jun; 64 ( Pt 3)():215-22. PubMed ID: 3767762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Problems of using anti-erythrocytic monoclonal antibodies in immunohematology].
    Minchenko ZhN, Chumak AA.
    Gematol Transfuziol; 1990 Aug; 35(8):38. PubMed ID: 2123809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.